Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Scientific solution to bureaucracy-applied-to-humans

Parent

Scientific solution to bureaucracy-applied-to-humans [closed]

+0
−6

Closed as unclear by Canina‭ on Sep 26, 2021 at 18:30

This question cannot be answered in its current form, because critical information is missing.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

I distinguish human-identification from bureaucracy-applied-to-humans:

  • There was a period in human history in which no state existed so no bureaucracy-applied-to-humans existed and humans identified one another just by sense and perhaps also general communication language as we use today
  • There was an even earlier period in human history in which no general communication languages as we use today existed so human-identification was done only by sense

Today, states record information about their citizens to identify them (their bodies):

  • Assigned name
  • Assigned date of birth
  • Assigned address
  • Image

Some problems with bureaucracy-applied-to-humans are:

  • It's forced upon someone which might not want to take part in it
  • Names, addresses and even calendars are not essential and can be changed at least in the mind of the subject
  • It may be grasped as "reducing" an entire human being's history into mere technical information
  • One can identify with two or more of the relevant detail types

These and maybe other problems consist a broader problem.
If any, what solutions does science holds to that problem?

Perhaps some kind of "computerized-genetic-human-identification" and Perhaps "world-government-microchip-identification"; perhaps something else?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Too confusing, close it. (2 comments)
General feedback (2 comments)
Post
+2
−1

Define every single human by their own phenotype, generation and breed.

DNA analysis has a price but it's not too expensive, childbirth has never been cheap afterall.

This way your identity is based on who were your anchestors, and technically children are nothing but 50% clones of both parents, thefore you are nothing but a partial clone of all your ancestors. True identity doesn't come from a name but from your blood.

You will be distinguished from your sisters and brothers by your generation.

You will be distinguished by other memebers of your country by breed.

Instead of name : phenotype

Instead of birthdate : generation

Instead of nationality : breed

Instead of national ID code : Eye prints and Finger prints

Now everyone can choose their "identity" like being called whatever they want cause those genetic factors are too hard to grasp for most people and useless in daily life other than being catalogued in a document.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Hello, I downvoted because you wrongly present me and other people as "nothing than DNA" which I fin... (3 comments)
Hello, I downvoted because you wrongly present me and other people as "nothing than DNA" which I fin...
deleted user wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago

Hello,

I downvoted because you wrongly present me and other people as "nothing than DNA" which I find as a very extreme materialistic approach towards a human as a combination of body (material) and mind (spirit). You said "True identity doesn't come from a name but from your blood" but the fact is that blood is not DNA, many different humans can share the same blood types (which cells are carried in that blood is another story and still doesn't neceesate an essential connetion). Also, I don't get how childbirth is a matter of "cheapness".

Thanks,

Rhea‭ wrote about 3 years ago

Not my fault if you are religious, biology doesn't care about your idealistic philosophy.

deleted user wrote about 3 years ago

Well, I grasp that your answer more than biology in it.