Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Scientific solution to bureaucracy-applied-to-humans

Post

Scientific solution to bureaucracy-applied-to-humans [closed]

+0
−6

Closed as unclear by Canina‭ on Sep 26, 2021 at 18:30

This question cannot be answered in its current form, because critical information is missing.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

I distinguish human-identification from bureaucracy-applied-to-humans:

  • There was a period in human history in which no state existed so no bureaucracy-applied-to-humans existed and humans identified one another just by sense and perhaps also general communication language as we use today
  • There was an even earlier period in human history in which no general communication languages as we use today existed so human-identification was done only by sense

Today, states record information about their citizens to identify them (their bodies):

  • Assigned name
  • Assigned date of birth
  • Assigned address
  • Image

Some problems with bureaucracy-applied-to-humans are:

  • It's forced upon someone which might not want to take part in it
  • Names, addresses and even calendars are not essential and can be changed at least in the mind of the subject
  • It may be grasped as "reducing" an entire human being's history into mere technical information
  • One can identify with two or more of the relevant detail types

These and maybe other problems consist a broader problem.
If any, what solutions does science holds to that problem?

Perhaps some kind of "computerized-genetic-human-identification" and Perhaps "world-government-microchip-identification"; perhaps something else?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Too confusing, close it. (2 comments)
General feedback (2 comments)
Too confusing, close it.
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 3 years ago

This question needs to be closed. It's not clear what you are asking. The first two bullet points seem to be irrelevant, and aren't necessarily right anyway. You talk about bureaucracy, but in the end it appears you just want a science-base way to identify humans. If that's really the case, then delete most of the babble and just say so. If it's not the case, then start over and clearly and concisely ask the question.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 3 years ago

What problem are you trying to solve? You don't want bureaucracy to be the answer, but I can't tell what the question is meant to be.