Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is a bigger planet than Earth with the same density possible?

+0
−0

Let's say there's a planet with 18 times the radius of Earth, but has the same density as Earth. If so, how would it be possible for a big planet to such a density of Earth? Would it have the same gravity as Earth?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/74960. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

That's no planet!

Let's say that the radius is $18R_{\oplus}$, where $R_{\oplus}$ is Earth's radius. The volume will then be $$\frac{4}{3}\pi(18R_{\oplus})^3\bar{\rho}=5832\left(\frac{4}{3}\pi R_{\oplus}^3\bar{\rho}\right)=5832M_{\oplus}$$ where $M_{\oplus}$ is the mass of Earth and we assume the same mean density $\bar{\rho}$ for both bodies. That's roughly $18.4$ times the mass of Jupiter. Something this massive isn't a rocky planet, and it isn't even a gas giant. It's like a decent-sized brown dwarf.

Brown dwarfs generally have higher densities than gas giants; their central densities can reach anywhere from $\sim10$ to $10^3\text{ g/cm}^3$, much greater than Earth's density of about $5.5\text{ g/cm}^3$. The brown dwarf is less dense towards its surface, and there's not really a clear boundary (as is the case with stars, as they're gaseous), so some parts will be more dense than Earth (on average), while others will be less dense.

I see that Mormacil's answer mentioned a question I answered two years ago and have, I think, cited a couple of times since. An important takeaway is that you can't simply add more and more mass to rocky planets and expect them to stay rocky. One group (Lammer et al. (2014)) found that at around $2M_{\oplus}$, rocky bodies will retain hydrogen/helium envelopes, entering a class of objects that are more like gas planets than rocky planets. Your $18M_{\oplus}$ "planet" certainly won't be terrestrial in nature. Based on Seager et al. 2008, the maximum achievable radius for a terrestrial planet is, optimistically, $4\text{-}5R_{\oplus}$, assuming a pure ocean world (which should be less dense than a silicate Earth-like planet of the same mass).

Surface gravity

The surface gravity $g$ is related to the radius $R$ by $$g\propto\bar{\rho}R$$ Given that $R=18R_{\oplus}$, the surface gravity will be 18 times that of Earth. Again, though, it's not clear where the surface of a brown dwarf actually is, so take this figure with a grain of salt.

Life

Life on brown dwarfs has been discussed in Can life arise on a brown dwarf?, among other places. Essentially, there are some big problems you'd need to overcome, including high temperatures and possible radiation.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »