Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on What is the most efficent way of killing prey much larger than yourself?

Post

What is the most efficent way of killing prey much larger than yourself?

+2
−0

The title sums it up pretty well - I'm basically trying to envision the ultimate predator of much larger prey. A couple of requirements:

  1. The predator must weigh 44 kilograms or more (Megafauna)
  2. It must be specialized in killing said prey
  3. It must be something that could plausibly evolve
  4. It must be terrestrial and have legs
  5. It must be endothermic
  6. It shall hunt in an environment roughly similar to a savannah
  7. The predator mustn't use tools to hunt, only its body

Pack predators are allowed, but let's limit it to less than 20 individuals in a single hunting group (So no swarming). It can be terrestrial, aquatic or aerial, and parasitoidism is allowed, but not preferred.

On the prey's size - basically, assume that the maximum mass of the prey will be 200,000 kilograms, and that the minimum will be roughly 10x the size of the predator. The closer the prey is to the maximum, the better.

I define efficiency as essentially "the likelihood of a hunting attempt being successful".

As for what I'm looking for in answers, I'd like them to describe as much as is necessary - if only one method or aspect is required for the task, then the rest of the details can be left for me to decide.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/124119. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)
General comments
Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Homo sapiens fit the bill very well, save for the "no tool" requirement. A group of early evolution humans could kill a mammoth using nothing but spears and hunting tactics. It's quite feasible that humans would also be able to kill such animals even without tools, by stressing them up and eventually force them to jump down a cliff or similar. Or into a pit, unless digging a pit counts as a tool.