Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Should Scientific Speculation support information-sharing that isn't in question form?

Parent

Should Scientific Speculation support information-sharing that isn't in question form?

+2
−0

We've had a couple posts (example (deleted), example) that aren't really questions, but are information and maybe starting points for development. Over on the Worldbuilding proposal we're talking about a 'workshop' category where such posts would fit. This isn't Worldbuilding, though there is a proposal to merge SciSpec into Worldbuilding, and we don't have that concept here yet, but -- should we? If ultimately the communities merge then problem solved, but while SciSpec remains separate, what do folks think about adding a "workshop" category here? It could support either or both of Q&A and wiki posts (articles, collaboratively edited).

History

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−0

I hardly ever find truthful information or ideas awkward.

But you ask a fine question? What are you here for?

My understanding : how I got here is the "anti-stackexchange stackexhange". While the effort required to get a question on the site is approaching needing one or two rounds of venture capital funding, and the likelihood of getting a good answer is approaching the likelihood of winning powerball, "anti-stackexchange" has an appeal. I think Worldbuilding SE may have morphed from a Q+A site to a place where Editors edit at one another.

Codidact puts people first; we're here to help you share knowledge and get curated answers in a friendly environment

Codidact Scientific Speculation is not very active : 6 new questions in the last year.

Hardly seems like such a small volume of text could offend anyone in any way. Yet, I've been contacted more than once to remove the tiny bit of content I have as "already answered elsewhere" (it wasn't), or "not really science", or "not really a question".

It isn't my site. And I am starting to regret visiting.

As a bit of friendly advice, if this place has just become a burden - why not pull the plug?

Short Version

I would sure like a place, any place, to share and discuss ideas that's a step above a chatroom, forum, reddit, or bulletin board.

I'm happy with re-organizing anywhere, but sure would like it if there's not a huge amount of churn "figuring it out"

History

1 comment thread

Thanks for your post. I've made a suggestion in response in a new answer. (1 comment)
Thanks for your post. I've made a suggestion in response in a new answer.
Monica Cellio‭ wrote 9 months ago

Thanks for your post. I've made a suggestion in response in a new answer.