Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Artificial Gravity Concepts

+0
−0

I wanted to share some artificial gravity concepts.

Natural Gravity

The best gravity would be natural gravity. What if we took engines and fuel and strapped them to a very large mass (ice, rock, or ballast metal)?

To get a modest 1/10th gee (1 m/s/s), we'd need :

  • a water ice (1 g/cm^3) block 3,750 km in diameter and massing 2.1E+23kg
  • a uranium block (19 g/cm^3) 200 km in diameter and massing 1.4E+20kg
  • an osmium block (22 g/cm^3) 166 km in diameter and massing 1E+20kg

So, there is an advantage to using denser material: you need less of it.

Accelerated Mass

What if we took less mass, but accelerated it in a ring collider to relativistic velocities to boost it's mass?

CERN says they can get a beta of 0.5.

That would reduce our base mass down to 5E+19kg, (which isn't much) and the mass energy required to do it is about the same amount of mass in matter+antimatter.

Boosted Mass

What if we changed the value of the Higgs field? Gluon-gluon fusion is the primary way of generating Higgs quanta, but all we need to do is modify the value of the Higgs field.

If I have this right, doubling v doubles mass: W_mu+/- = gv / 2.

A rough estimate of the energy used by the Large Hadron Collider to produce Higgs bosons is 13 TeV, or about 2 microjoules per encounter.

Obviously, it took more power for LHC to get there: an estimated 500 megaWatts.

But this is far better than planet-masses of antimatter.

Direct Graviton Production

The most energy efficient way would be to somehow produce gravitons (if they exist) directly. This would get the energy cost of artificial gravity down to (hopefully) the minimum : P = mass x gee (or 9.8 kiloWatts per ton).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

This question (and another older one) prompted me to ask [Should Scientific Speculation support infor... (1 comment)

1 answer

+0
−0

This is a very interesting set of ideas. Here is some maths to ponder: To find the surface gravity of a world made of exotic materials...

(average density [g/cc] X Radius [km]) / 35000 = G [Surface Grav]

The answer for Earth is 1.0 G

Let's try Osmium --

22.6 g/cc X 1500 Km / 35000 = 9.7 Very close to Earth's surface grav, but one fourth the radius.

-Molly

  • The 35000 is a conversion constant derived from the universal gravitation constant and the arbitrary Earth G of "one".
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »