Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on What happens if Earth's magnetic field shuts down? How long does it take for damage to occur?

Parent

What happens if Earth's magnetic field shuts down? How long does it take for damage to occur?

+3
−0

What happens if Earth's magnetic field shuts down? How exactly does this impact humans, and how long before we need to make significant changes for survival?

Does it make any difference if Earth's magnetic field shuts down "rapidly" vs., say, slowly decreasing by 2% a week for a decade?

My understanding is that, as Earth's interior cools, we expect that in the distant future eventually Earth's magnetic field will shut down. For story / plot reasons, my story has this occurring near the present day plus or minus a hundred years (perhaps during WWII, roughly the same time the two magnetic north "local poles" were located by Project Nanook (a) ).

Some people imply that if the magnetic field of the Earth is not really that significant to human life, at least in the "near future" of few thousand years. (a) (b)

Other people claim that the magnetic field of the Earth is absolutely necessary for human life ( (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) ) or for human-like life (the Laschamp event may have led to the the extinction of the Neanderthals).

Related:

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

One source of information might be "A City on Mars" (1 comment)
Post
+0
−0

Earth will be devastated.

I'll try to give you a highlevel rundown of what would happen.

Rapidly vs. Slowly

Yes, the effects would be substantially different. Depending on the speed of fading the effects on earth would become increasingly stronger. The worst case being the dissolving from one second to the next.

Important factor: The Sun

Sun's activity plays a major role for the effects on earth after the magnetic shielding is gone.

Solar winds are the main reason why we need the magnetosphere around us. It protects earth's atmosphere and therefore all life on earth. Otherwise we would be exposed to high amounts of radiation (like in: radio active radiation; but probably worse, because nearly constant and in high, lethal doses).

However, the amount of particles the sun emits is not constant. It fluctuates. Sometimes there are solar bursts or storms, throwing large amounts of highly charged particles outwards flying at high speeds. Sometimes solar wind is "relatively" calm, but still deadly.

Effects on Earth (from high to low)

Let's assume the effect of dissolving is over, meaning either it took a while or some seconds and now the magnetic shield is gone.

Satellites would suffer first. They are most vulnerable because of their high-tech components. Solar winds can induce high amounts of current into the electric circuits, causing overloading, short circuits or melting of delicate components, leaving the satellite eventually disabled and adrift in space.

Solar winds will also start to push the satellites slowly but steadily out of their orbits (over the course of centuries probably, depending on strength).

Next being hit are the astronauts in the space stations ISS and CSS/Tiangong. They have protective installments but they are not sufficient against the unbraked storm of particles.

Afterwards the atmosphere is hit by the solar wind. This will cause the atmosphere to erode over time. It will be "carried away" or "ripped off" the earth piece by piece and dissolved into space.

This process is again heavily dependent on the sun. If there are no superficially increased levels, it will probably take decades or centuries until the effect on the surface will start to become inhospitable.

On the surface, gradually with the decay of the magnetosphere, there would be heavily disturbing lights all over the sky, also at night. Very similar, but stronger and brighter, to the Aurora Borealis/Australis (north/south pole). This will start to disturb life on earth already significantly. Nights would never be dark again.

If the ozone layer is gone, UV radiation from the sun will also draw its tribute from earth. Atmosphere in general will thin out and get unbreathable, higher amounts of winds/storms are probably induced, airplanes will not be safe to fly in, temperatures will rise globally, plants and crops will dry out, water will vaporize at some point, humans and animals will suffer from the high radiation levels, famine rises, the death toll will be extreme. Some counter-measures will probably be possible (bunkers), but not sustainable forever.

Since you asked specifically for humans: They will suffer like those poor souls exposed to the uncontrolled radio active fires of Chernobyl back in 1986. At a certain point this will just be gruelsome. Radioactive burns and poisioning and almost instantly lethal doses.

Eventually earth will be a barren rock in space. Similar to Mars. No magnetosphere, no atmosphere, everything radio actively contaminated, no life.

Van-Allen-Belt

The Van-Allen-Belt is the inner most part of the magnetosphere around earth. It is considered especially malicious to high-tech instruments in lower earth orbits.

What you have maybe found was the notion that the Van-Allen-Radiation-Belt is considered a nuisance and there are considerations and even plans to remove or deplete it. Wikipedia has it that it is suspected not having any effects if the innermost part would be drained (-- I doubt that heavily).

Articles

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Solar winds will also disturb electronics at ground (basically a permanent Carrington event). (1 comment)
Satellites (2 comments)
Satellites
Lundin‭ wrote 2 months ago

I doubt your claims about satellites are correct, the components will already be sealed more or less in a Faraday cage. There is probably no obvious way for currents to flow - thanks to the already nasty environment, the chassis will not likely be grounded in the same manner as the chassis of a car. Radioactive particles clinging to the chassis of the satellite might be more of a concern, as these may cause memory corruptions etc disturbing CPUs, but the components and software will already be designed with radioactivity in mind.

Antares‭ wrote 2 months ago · edited 2 months ago

Lundin‭ Valid points you make there. I described a really worst case scenario with an immensely strong solar wind hitting the satellites overwhelming all the protection the satellites already have. The real mileage may vary.