Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Meta Are economic speculation questions on-topic?

I once had a question Somewhere Else about an economic stipulation and how its imposition would affect the world. I didn't think it to be a good stipulation and expected to be skewered by answers p...

1 answer  ·  posted 3mo ago by Michael‭  ·  edited 3mo ago by Canina‭

#3: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2024-09-07T08:49:02Z (3 months ago)
Delete no-longer-referenced footnote
  • I once had a question Somewhere Else about an economic stipulation and how its imposition would affect the world. I didn't think it to be a *good* stipulation and expected to be skewered by answers pointing out huge loopholes. But instead the question was closed.
  • Rather than repeat the experience na&iuml;vely: Is economics "scientific" enough for this community?
  • [^1]: Also someone wrote a negative comment about Americans, which in retrospect, I should have flagged as inappropriate.
  • I once had a question Somewhere Else about an economic stipulation and how its imposition would affect the world. I didn't think it to be a *good* stipulation and expected to be skewered by answers pointing out huge loopholes. But instead the question was closed.
  • Rather than repeat the experience na&iuml;vely: Is economics "scientific" enough for this community?
#2: Post edited by user avatar Michael‭ · 2024-09-06T13:18:19Z (3 months ago)
Wipe the aside
  • I once had a question Somewhere Else about an economic stipulation and how its imposition would affect the world. I didn't think it to be a *good* stipulation and expected to be skewered by answers pointing out huge loopholes. But instead the question was closed.[^1]
  • Rather than repeat the experience na&iuml;vely: Is economics "scientific" enough for this community?
  • [^1]: Also someone wrote a negative comment about Americans, which in retrospect, I should have flagged as inappropriate.
  • I once had a question Somewhere Else about an economic stipulation and how its imposition would affect the world. I didn't think it to be a *good* stipulation and expected to be skewered by answers pointing out huge loopholes. But instead the question was closed.
  • Rather than repeat the experience na&iuml;vely: Is economics "scientific" enough for this community?
  • [^1]: Also someone wrote a negative comment about Americans, which in retrospect, I should have flagged as inappropriate.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Michael‭ · 2024-09-05T21:33:27Z (3 months ago)
Are economic speculation questions on-topic?
I once had a question Somewhere Else about an economic stipulation and how its imposition would affect the world. I didn't think it to be a *good* stipulation and expected to be skewered by answers pointing out huge loopholes. But instead the question was closed.[^1]

Rather than repeat the experience na&iuml;vely: Is economics "scientific" enough for this community?

[^1]: Also someone wrote a negative comment about Americans, which in retrospect, I should have flagged as inappropriate.