Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

37%
+1 −3
Meta Shouldnt this question be moved instead of closed ?

I'm a little disappointed that How can Single Vision lenses slow myopia for adults too? was deemed off topic. Can anyone explain to me why? It is indeed science speculation, it should be on rigoro...

2 answers  ·  posted 1y ago by Or4ng3h4t‭  ·  edited 1y ago by trichoplax‭

Question discussion support
#2: Post edited by user avatar trichoplax‭ · 2023-09-08T13:37:40Z (about 1 year ago)
Tidying and including the example question name in the link text
Shouldnt this question be moved instead of closed ?
  • Honestly im a little disappointed that [this question](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/286663) was deemed out of topic, can anyone explain to me why ? it is indeed science speculation, it should be on rigorous sciences.The author linked multiple sources and made a good question and points through the question what makes him question that, with tons of information, its well writen.Why close instead of move ?
  • I'm a little disappointed that [How can Single Vision lenses slow myopia for adults too?](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/286663) was deemed off topic. Can anyone explain to me why?
  • It is indeed science speculation, it should be on rigorous sciences. The author linked multiple sources and made a good question, pointing out what makes him ask the question, with tons of information. It's well written. Why close instead of move?
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Or4ng3h4t‭ · 2023-09-08T11:14:53Z (about 1 year ago)
Shouldnt this question be moved instead of closed ?
Honestly im a little disappointed that [this question](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/286663) was deemed out of topic, can anyone explain to me why ? it is indeed science speculation, it should be on rigorous sciences.The author linked multiple sources and made a good question and points through the question what makes him question that, with tons of information, its well writen.Why close instead of move ?