Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Analogue Encryption, without converting to digital

No, the scheme described doesn't make sense, regardless if it is digital or analog. Anybody can intercept the public key and decrypt so the scheme doesn't protect against eavesdroppers. The entiti...

posted 10mo ago by Maarten Bodewes‭  ·  edited 10mo ago by Maarten Bodewes‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Maarten Bodewes‭ · 2023-07-09T17:27:25Z (10 months ago)
  • No, the scheme described doesn't make sense, regardless if it is digital or analog.
  • Anybody can intercept the public key and decrypt so the scheme doesn't protect against eavesdroppers. To get a two side authenticated connection the system needs a key pair for which the public key is trusted by the other party.
  • That way an entity can authenticate itself. As long as that's possible then there are multiple ways of establishing a shared secret.
  • If you're looking for generic ways of applying analogue encryption you can have a look [at this Q/A on Cryptography.SE](https://crypto.stackexchange.com/a/15015/1172).
  • No, the scheme described doesn't make sense, regardless if it is digital or analog.
  • Anybody can intercept the public key and decrypt so the scheme doesn't protect against eavesdroppers. The entities are not authenticated either, so active attacks are also possible. To get a two side authenticated connection the system needs a key pair for which the public key is trusted by the other party.
  • That way an entity can authenticate itself. As long as that's possible then there are multiple ways of establishing a shared secret.
  • If you're looking for generic ways of applying analogue encryption you can have a look [at this Q/A on Cryptography.SE](https://crypto.stackexchange.com/a/15015/1172).
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Maarten Bodewes‭ · 2023-07-09T17:25:44Z (10 months ago)
No, the scheme described doesn't make sense, regardless if it is digital or analog.

Anybody can intercept the public key and decrypt so the scheme doesn't protect against eavesdroppers. To get a two side authenticated connection the system needs a key pair for which the public key is trusted by the other party. 

That way an entity can authenticate itself. As long as that's possible then there are multiple ways of establishing a shared secret.

If you're looking for generic ways of applying analogue encryption you can have a look [at this Q/A on Cryptography.SE](https://crypto.stackexchange.com/a/15015/1172).