Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Is Scientific Speculation the Right Place for a Discussion Series About Space Sports?

+3
−0

I feel like science fiction doesn't have many sports, other than the occasional laser battle or fantasy sword duel.

I'd like to start a discussion series about sports in a low-gravity/no-gravity environment. Not necessarily a single question with a single answer. I started with a question about wrestling, but have ideas for (at least) sailing, fishing, bocce, and golf.

Is this site the right place to do that? Is Q&A the right place to locate those topics?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

related https://xkcd.com/2705/ :) (1 comment)

1 answer

+4
−0

I'm speaking as a regular user here despite that "staff" label next to my name. Scope is decided by communities, not imposed from above.

I think science-based questions about sports, like golf in low-gravity or sailing in high atmospheric pressure or fishing in waters of different composition, etc, are all in scope here. As with all other questions, include enough details about your environment, and your question, that people can answer.

Open-ended discussions or questions that are too broad aren't a good fit for the Q&A format, because each response probably needs to add some starting assumptions and those will be all over the board -- it's hard to find an on-target answer amidst all the discussion.

But this doesn't mean this community can't host such content if people want. Q&A is a core feature of Codidact but not the only possibility. If this community wants to have a blog where individuals can explore topics like this, it can. If the community wants a category for open-ended, not-really-answerable discussions of broad premises, it can. If it wants to structure this some other way, it can.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »