Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

83%
+8 −0
Q&A If this earth were cube shaped would it be possible during Magellanic era using a float ship to figure out that the earth is cube shaped?

The shape of the Earth is mostly a result of its gravity pulling its mass into the most efficient shape available. The oceans are also pulled towards the centre of mass, and collect on the lowest ...

posted 2y ago by Pastychomper‭  ·  edited 2y ago by Pastychomper‭

Answer
#3: Post edited by user avatar Pastychomper‭ · 2022-06-20T14:19:34Z (over 2 years ago)
Corrected vertices -> edges as per Jacob C's comment
  • The shape of the Earth is mostly a result of its gravity pulling its mass into the most efficient shape available. The oceans are also pulled towards the centre of mass, and collect on the lowest parts of the surface - covering a huge area to a depth of only a few miles because the planet is so smooth.
  • If Earth managed to be sufficiently rigid and hold a cube shape, its gravity would still pull _on average_ towards its centre of mass, which would be the centre of the cube. Any water would pool in the middle of the flat faces of the cube to form roundish oceans.
  • The ocean(s) would bulge outwards as if trying to form parts of a sphere. The gravity of the corners and vertices of the planet would flatten the bulge a bit, but they'd be a lot deeper (and therefore narrower) than the current oceans. Unless there was far more water available, they would never reach the vertices of the cube so a boat couldn't sail from one face to another.
  • You could think of it as a spherical planet with several enormous ridges reaching hundreds of miles high. As well as water, the atmosphere would pool in the lower regions, so five of the cube's faces are probably inaccessible to humans until they learn to make pressurised vehicles.
  • Your explorer might be able to determine the shape of the world by other means. Ancient Greek-style geometry could prove that the sea curves and the land doesn't, and as [Peter Taylor](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/users/36356) pointed out, you could see the shadow of at least part of the Earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse.
  • The shape of the Earth is mostly a result of its gravity pulling its mass into the most efficient shape available. The oceans are also pulled towards the centre of mass, and collect on the lowest parts of the surface - covering a huge area to a depth of only a few miles because the planet is so smooth.
  • If Earth managed to be sufficiently rigid and hold a cube shape, its gravity would still pull _on average_ towards its centre of mass, which would be the centre of the cube. Any water would pool in the middle of the flat faces of the cube to form roundish oceans. You could think of it as a spherical planet with several ridges reaching hundreds of miles high.
  • The ocean(s) would bulge outwards as if trying to form parts of a sphere. The gravity of the extremities of the planet would flatten the bulge a bit, but they'd be a lot deeper (and therefore narrower) than the current oceans. Unless there was far more water available, they would never reach the edges of the cube so a boat couldn't sail from one face to another.
  • As well as water, the atmosphere would pool in the lower regions, so five of the cube's faces are probably inaccessible to humans until they learn to make pressurised vehicles.
  • Your explorer might be able to determine the shape of the world by other means. Ancient Greek-style geometry could prove that the sea curves and the land doesn't, and as [Peter Taylor](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/users/36356) pointed out, you could see the shadow of at least part of the Earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Pastychomper‭ · 2022-05-19T15:22:32Z (over 2 years ago)
Added eclipse
  • The shape of the Earth is mostly a result of its gravity pulling its mass into the most efficient shape available. The oceans are also pulled towards the centre of mass, and collect on the lowest parts of the surface - covering a huge area to a depth of only a few miles because the planet is so smooth.
  • If Earth managed to be sufficiently rigid and hold a cube shape, its gravity would still pull _on average_ towards its centre of mass, which would be the centre of the cube. Any water would pool in the middle of the flat faces of the cube to form roundish oceans.
  • The ocean(s) would bulge outwards as if trying to form parts of a sphere. The gravity of the corners and vertices of the planet would flatten the bulge a bit, but they'd be a lot deeper (and therefore narrower) than the current oceans. Unless there was far more water available, they would never reach the vertices of the cube so a boat couldn't sail from one face to another.
  • You could think of it as a spherical planet with several enormous, wide ridges reaching several hundred miles high. As well as the water, the atmosphere would pool in the lower regions (middle of the cube face(s)), so five of the cube's faces are probably inaccessible to humans until they learn to make pressurised vehicles.
  • Your explorer might be able to determine the shape of the world by other means. Ancient Greek-style geometry could be used to prove that the sea curves and the land doesn't, but confirming that it's a cube rather than, for example, a square-based pyramid would have to wait until someone crossed a vertex.
  • The shape of the Earth is mostly a result of its gravity pulling its mass into the most efficient shape available. The oceans are also pulled towards the centre of mass, and collect on the lowest parts of the surface - covering a huge area to a depth of only a few miles because the planet is so smooth.
  • If Earth managed to be sufficiently rigid and hold a cube shape, its gravity would still pull _on average_ towards its centre of mass, which would be the centre of the cube. Any water would pool in the middle of the flat faces of the cube to form roundish oceans.
  • The ocean(s) would bulge outwards as if trying to form parts of a sphere. The gravity of the corners and vertices of the planet would flatten the bulge a bit, but they'd be a lot deeper (and therefore narrower) than the current oceans. Unless there was far more water available, they would never reach the vertices of the cube so a boat couldn't sail from one face to another.
  • You could think of it as a spherical planet with several enormous ridges reaching hundreds of miles high. As well as water, the atmosphere would pool in the lower regions, so five of the cube's faces are probably inaccessible to humans until they learn to make pressurised vehicles.
  • Your explorer might be able to determine the shape of the world by other means. Ancient Greek-style geometry could prove that the sea curves and the land doesn't, and as [Peter Taylor](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/users/36356) pointed out, you could see the shadow of at least part of the Earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Pastychomper‭ · 2022-04-01T14:46:24Z (over 2 years ago)
The shape of the Earth is mostly a result of its gravity pulling its mass into the most efficient shape available.  The oceans are also pulled towards the centre of mass, and collect on the lowest parts of the surface - covering a huge area to a depth of only a few miles because the planet is so smooth. 

If Earth managed to be sufficiently rigid and hold a cube shape, its gravity would still pull _on average_ towards its centre of mass, which would be the centre of the cube.  Any water would pool in the middle of the flat faces of the cube to form roundish oceans. 

The ocean(s) would bulge outwards as if trying to form parts of a sphere.  The gravity of the corners and vertices of the planet would flatten the bulge a bit, but they'd be a lot deeper (and therefore narrower) than the current oceans.  Unless there was far more water available, they would never reach the vertices of the cube so a boat couldn't sail from one face to another.  

You could think of it as a spherical planet with several enormous, wide ridges reaching several hundred miles high.  As well as the water, the atmosphere would pool in the lower regions (middle of the cube face(s)), so five of the cube's faces are probably inaccessible to humans until they learn to make pressurised vehicles.

Your explorer might be able to determine the shape of the world by other means. Ancient Greek-style geometry could be used to prove that the sea curves and the land doesn't, but confirming that it's a cube rather than, for example, a square-based pyramid would have to wait until someone crossed a vertex.