Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

66%
+4 −1
Meta How can we grow this community?

The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content. My answer to your question in Outdoors mostly applies. A few differences to note: The recent rash ...

posted 3y ago by Olin Lathrop‭  ·  edited 3y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2021-12-02T16:44:16Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content. My <a href="https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/285028/285056#answer-285056">answer to your question in Outdoors</a> mostly applies.
  • A few differences to note:<ul>
  • <li>The recent rash of dumb or lazy questions doesn't apply, since we've had barely any questions.
  • <li>It's harder to find a good question here. Too many are just silly, seemingly asked without even considering basic high school physics.
  • <li>The Rigorous Science category makes no sense. The description is worded so that even I am afraid to ask anything there. As with other low-volume sites, splitting content into different buckets makes the whole site look even more empty than it already is.
  • </ul>
  • The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content. My <a href="https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/285028/285056#answer-285056">answer to your question in Outdoors</a> mostly applies.
  • A few differences to note:<ul>
  • <li>The recent rash of dumb or lazy questions doesn't apply, since we've had barely any questions.
  • <li>It's harder to find a good question here. Too many are just silly, seemingly asked without even considering basic high school physics.
  • <li>The Rigorous Science category makes no sense. The description is worded so that even I am afraid to ask anything there. As with other low-volume sites, splitting content into different buckets makes the whole site look more empty than it already is.
  • </ul>
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2021-12-02T16:43:26Z (almost 3 years ago)
The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content.  My <a href="https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/285028/285056#answer-285056">answer to your question in Outdoors</a> mostly applies.

A few differences to note:<ul>

<li>The recent rash of dumb or lazy questions doesn't apply, since we've had barely any questions.

<li>It's harder to find a good question here.  Too many are just silly, seemingly asked without even considering basic high school physics.

<li>The Rigorous Science category makes no sense.  The description is worded so that even I am afraid to ask anything there.  As with other low-volume sites, splitting content into different buckets makes the whole site look even more empty than it already is.

</ul>