Post History
The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content. My answer to your question in Outdoors mostly applies. A few differences to note: The recent rash ...
Answer
#2: Post edited
- The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content. My <a href="https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/285028/285056#answer-285056">answer to your question in Outdoors</a> mostly applies.
- A few differences to note:<ul>
- <li>The recent rash of dumb or lazy questions doesn't apply, since we've had barely any questions.
- <li>It's harder to find a good question here. Too many are just silly, seemingly asked without even considering basic high school physics.
<li>The Rigorous Science category makes no sense. The description is worded so that even I am afraid to ask anything there. As with other low-volume sites, splitting content into different buckets makes the whole site look even more empty than it already is.- </ul>
- The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content. My <a href="https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/285028/285056#answer-285056">answer to your question in Outdoors</a> mostly applies.
- A few differences to note:<ul>
- <li>The recent rash of dumb or lazy questions doesn't apply, since we've had barely any questions.
- <li>It's harder to find a good question here. Too many are just silly, seemingly asked without even considering basic high school physics.
- <li>The Rigorous Science category makes no sense. The description is worded so that even I am afraid to ask anything there. As with other low-volume sites, splitting content into different buckets makes the whole site look more empty than it already is.
- </ul>
#1: Initial revision
The issues here are largely the same as with the Outdoors site, including the imported content. My <a href="https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/285028/285056#answer-285056">answer to your question in Outdoors</a> mostly applies. A few differences to note:<ul> <li>The recent rash of dumb or lazy questions doesn't apply, since we've had barely any questions. <li>It's harder to find a good question here. Too many are just silly, seemingly asked without even considering basic high school physics. <li>The Rigorous Science category makes no sense. The description is worded so that even I am afraid to ask anything there. As with other low-volume sites, splitting content into different buckets makes the whole site look even more empty than it already is. </ul>