Post History
Is it plausible to assume that the total amount of water (edit: water molecules) on planet earth was, in different periods of earth's history, significantly lower or significantly higher, or rather...
#3: Post edited
Is it plausible to assume that the total amount of water on planet earth was, in different periods of earth's history, significantly lower or significantly higher, or rather, the amount of water is pretty much (99%?) stable since the dawn of earth?
- Is it plausible to assume that the total amount of water (**edit: water molecules**) on planet earth was, in different periods of earth's history, significantly lower or significantly higher, or rather, the amount of water is pretty much (99%?) stable since the dawn of earth?
#2: Post edited
Is it plausible to assume that the total amount of water on planet earth was, in different periods of earth's history, significantly lower or significantly higher ("oceanic world")?Or rather, the amount of water is pretty much (99%?) stable since the dawn of earth?
- Is it plausible to assume that the total amount of water on planet earth was, in different periods of earth's history, significantly lower or significantly higher, or rather, the amount of water is pretty much (99%?) stable since the dawn of earth?
#1: Initial revision
Was the total amount of water on earth ever significantly different?
Is it plausible to assume that the total amount of water on planet earth was, in different periods of earth's history, significantly lower or significantly higher ("oceanic world")?
Or rather, the amount of water is pretty much (99%?) stable since the dawn of earth?