Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

57%
+2 −1
Q&A Natural ways to acquire gravity and heat for a colony on earth's moon

There seem to be two separate questions here: Would a moon colony need to be deep underground to get more gravity? No. This is basic physics. Going deeper into the a gravitational body reduces ...

posted 3y ago by Olin Lathrop‭  ·  edited 3y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2021-06-13T22:41:55Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • There seem to be two separate questions here:
  • <blockquote>Would a moon colony need to be deep underground to get more gravity?</blockquote>
  • <b>No.</b> This is basic physics.
  • Going deeper into the a gravitational body <i>reduces</i> gravity. Think of the limiting case where you are in the middle of the moon. Gravity would pull equally in all directions, cancelling out. You would be weightless there.
  • <blockquote>Would a moon colony need to be deep underground to get more natural heat?</blockquote>
  • Huh? What does "natural" heat mean? What would be unnatural heat?
  • The answer is probably "no". The main source of heat on the moon is sunlight. Going deeper would reduce fluctuations to get closer to the average, not not really much more heat. The moon is too small to retain much fossil heat. The small volume relative to the surface area also means that heat from radioisotope decay is much less significant than on Earth.
  • A lunar colony would likely use solar collectors as a significant source of power, including heat. The main problem with that is the long nights, and therefore need for a large amount of storage, or additional power generation, like nuclear reactors.
  • There seem to be two separate questions here:
  • <blockquote>Would a moon colony need to be deep underground to get more gravity?</blockquote>
  • <b>No.</b> This is basic physics.
  • Going deeper into the a gravitational body <i>reduces</i> gravity. Think of the limiting case where you are in a hollow chamber in the middle of the moon. Gravity would pull equally in all directions, cancelling out. You would be weightless there.
  • <blockquote>Would a moon colony need to be deep underground to get more natural heat?</blockquote>
  • Huh? What does "natural" heat mean? What would be unnatural heat?
  • The answer is probably "no". The main source of heat on the moon is sunlight. Going deeper would reduce fluctuations to get closer to the average, not not really much more heat. The moon is too small to retain much fossil heat. The small volume relative to the surface area also means that heat from radioisotope decay is much less significant than on Earth.
  • A lunar colony would likely use solar collectors as a significant source of power, including heat. The main problem with that is the long nights, and therefore need for a large amount of storage, or additional power generation, like nuclear reactors.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2021-06-13T13:32:40Z (almost 3 years ago)
There seem to be two separate questions here:

<blockquote>Would a moon colony need to be deep underground to get more gravity?</blockquote>

<b>No.</b>  This is basic physics.

Going deeper into the a gravitational body <i>reduces</i> gravity.  Think of the limiting case where you are in the middle of the moon.  Gravity would pull equally in all directions, cancelling out.  You would be weightless there.

<blockquote>Would a moon colony need to be deep underground to get more natural heat?</blockquote>

Huh?  What does "natural" heat mean?  What would be unnatural heat?

The answer is probably "no".  The main source of heat on the moon is sunlight.  Going deeper would reduce fluctuations to get closer to the average, not not really much more heat.  The moon is too small to retain much fossil heat.  The small volume relative to the surface area also means that heat from radioisotope decay is much less significant than on Earth.

A lunar colony would likely use solar collectors as a significant source of power, including heat.  The main problem with that is the long nights, and therefore need for a large amount of storage, or additional power generation, like nuclear reactors.