Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A Plausibility of "multi-type transmissible animal cell tumor" to form more complex structures.

Would it be possible for multiple types of "cancer" cells (or at least host foreign animal cells) to work in unison to create new structures? Normal cancer, inasmuch as there is such a thing, ...

posted 3y ago by sox‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar sox‭ · 2021-02-10T19:04:16Z (about 3 years ago)
>  Would it be possible for multiple types of "cancer" cells (or at least host foreign animal cells) to work in unison to create new structures? 

Normal cancer, inasmuch as there is such a thing, doesn't really seem to work like that... cancer cells are fundamentally broken things, because of the wide range of safeguards that healthy cells have to prevent them becoming cancerous. They carry on doing the things they used to do, to the best of their ability given their damaged state.

> For example, extending a cardio vascular system, 

Angiogenesis is very much a thing in many kinds of tumour, but it isn't the cancer cells themselves forming the blood vessels. Instead they make use of existing signalling mechanisms to induce healthy tissue to form new blood vessels to feed the tumour.

> or nervous system through out the tumor

Whilst blood vessel (re)generation is a common trick, regrowing nerves (and especially regrowing nerves _quickly_) is rather more limited. It doesn't seem totally beyond the realms of possibility, but it does seem dubious, if you were expecting to have complex signalling through the tumour.

> or, at the most far fetched side of things, a new appendage, like a cancerous "ear" formation

Stem cell cancers can produce differentiated tissue, but the structures seem to be fairly simple (see above, cancer cells are broken) and messy things.

In a species with the ability to regerate complex structures it might be possible for a cancer to hijack regeneration mechanisms in the same way that more conventional mammalian cancers can hijack angiogenesis. This wouldn't be an effect that could cross species though; the capability would have to be present in the "host" species infected by your transmissible cancer, rather than being something the cancer could bring itself.

----

As a potentially interesting aside, stem cells can be quite hazardous in themselves... there's at least one documented case of someone undergoing experimental stem cell therapy ending up with healthy snot-producing cells developing _in their spine_. Removing proliferating but healthy stem cells is much harder than dealing with cancer as the usual mechanisms of cancer treatment are much less effective on healthy cells (obviously).

[Autograft-derived spinal cord mass following olfactory mucosal cell transplantation in a spinal cord injury patient](https://thejns.org/spine/view/journals/j-neurosurg-spine/21/4/article-p618.xml)