Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Rigorous Science

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Rigorous Science Difference between 'AWPP' and standard quantum physics

Quantum Computers are considered a more powerful type of computer than so called 'classical' computers. While a typical classical computer could be considered as a black box that can solve Polynomi...

0 answers  ·  posted 4y ago by Mithrandir24601‭

#1: Initial revision by user avatar Mithrandir24601‭ · 2020-12-21T21:45:40Z (almost 4 years ago)
Difference between 'AWPP' and standard quantum physics
Quantum Computers are considered a more powerful type of computer than so called 'classical' computers. While a typical classical computer could be considered as a black box that can solve [Polynomial time (P)](https://complexityzoo.net/Complexity_Zoo:P#p) problems in polynomial time (i.e. 'efficiently'), a typical (universal, fault tolerant) quantum computer can solve [Bounded-error Quantum Polynomial time (BQP)](https://complexityzoo.net/Complexity_Zoo:B#bqp) problems 'efficiently'.

However, on physical grounds, it appears that quantum computers cannot efficiently solve [Postselected BQP (Post-BQP)](https://complexityzoo.net/Complexity_Zoo:P#postbqp) problems. Thanks to Scott Aaronson's [Quantum Computing, Postselection, and Probabilistic Polynomial-Time](https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0412187), it's known that this is largely due to the requirement that efficiently solving such a problem would require a massive fundamental change in the laws of physics:

- the probability of a successful measurement would be $\lvert\psi\rvert^p$ for some $p\neq 2$, instead of the usual $p=2$ in quantum physics.
- quantum physics would allow for linear but non-unitary transformations as well as unitary ones.

It turns out that there are other complexity classes *between* BQP and Post-BQP. Perhaps the most interesting of these is [Almost-Wide Probabilistic Polynomial (AWPP)](https://complexityzoo.net/Complexity_Zoo:A#awpp), which can be considered the [best upper bound of BQP](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/17/8/083001). The main assumption behind AWPP is that physics is [tomographically local](https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1538), although it's reckoned that quantum physics [isn't quite enough to efficiently solve an AWPP problem](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-019-0156-9).

I'm interested in learning about the differences (if any) between (current) quantum physics and a physical 'AWPP-theory', so my question here is this: **if we lived in a universe where physics naturally described AWPP computation, what would the physical and computational differences (if any) be between such a universe and the one we actually live in?**