Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A Competently Mobile Photosynthetic Animal?

I have an idea for a land based mobile organism that moves and uses photosynthesis for its primary means of energy generation. Can a motile organism conceivably get enough energy from photosyntheti...

1 answer  ·  posted 4y ago by Cazadorro‭  ·  edited 4y ago by Cazadorro‭

Question biology plant animal
#2: Post edited by user avatar Cazadorro‭ · 2020-06-28T17:47:55Z (almost 4 years ago)
  • I have an idea for a land based mobile organism that moves and uses photosynthesis for its primary means of energy generation. Can a motile organism conceivably get enough energy from photosynthetic processes as its primary energy source to move at a competent speed?
  • Said animal doesn't have to be elephant sized, something as small as a rabbit would be fine, but said animal would have to be as fast as average animals of its mass. For example, venus flytrap wouldn't count, it can't really move anywhere. [Elysia Chlorotica](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysia_chlorotica#:~:text=Some%20members%20of%20this%20group,marine%20heterokont%20alga%20Vaucheria%20litorea.) doesn't count because of its speed, its heterotrophic tendencies, size, and ocean dwelling habitat.
  • According to this [answer](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/questions/206856#answer-206857) plants have low energy production rates. However it seems due to the [square cube law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square%E2%80%93cube_law), it would seem that for smaller animals even current efficiencies of photo synthesis should be more effective, especially for a cold blooded animal.
  • Additionally lots of plants are known to be primarily CO2 limited^[Ecology of the Planted Aquarium, Walstad], not limited by light, and [indeed too much light can harm plants](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2005/01/too-much-good-thing#:~:text=Plants%20are%20supposed%20to%20crave,create%20potentially%20deadly%20free%20radicals.&text=But%20if%20the%20plants%20are,that%20can%20destroy%20the%20plant.), causing plants to change in response, such as [turning red](https://buceplant.com/blogs/news/four-tips-for-achieving-red-aquarium-plants). This leads me to believe that if an organism could make use of that extra energy, the efficiency of photosynthesis may be able to be increased to compensate beyond the levels seen by modern plants.
  • I have an idea for a land based mobile organism that moves and uses photosynthesis for its primary means of energy generation. Can a motile organism conceivably get enough energy from photosynthetic processes as its primary energy source to move at a competent speed?
  • Said animal doesn't have to be elephant sized, something as small as a rabbit would be fine, but said animal would have to be as fast as average animals of its mass. For example, venus flytrap wouldn't count, it can't really move anywhere. [Elysia Chlorotica](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysia_chlorotica#:~:text=Some%20members%20of%20this%20group,marine%20heterokont%20alga%20Vaucheria%20litorea.) doesn't count because of its speed, its heterotrophic tendencies, size, and ocean dwelling habitat.
  • According to this [answer](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/questions/206856#answer-206857) plants have low energy production rates. However it seems due to the [square cube law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square%E2%80%93cube_law), it would seem that for smaller animals even current efficiencies of photo synthesis should be more effective, especially for a cold blooded animal.
  • Additionally lots of plants are known to be primarily CO2 limited[^1], not limited by light, and [indeed too much light can harm plants](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2005/01/too-much-good-thing#:~:text=Plants%20are%20supposed%20to%20crave,create%20potentially%20deadly%20free%20radicals.&text=But%20if%20the%20plants%20are,that%20can%20destroy%20the%20plant.), causing plants to change in response, such as [turning red](https://buceplant.com/blogs/news/four-tips-for-achieving-red-aquarium-plants). This leads me to believe that if an organism could make use of that extra energy, the efficiency of photosynthesis may be able to be increased to compensate beyond the levels seen by modern plants.
  • [^1]: Ecology of the Planted Aquarium, Walstad
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Cazadorro‭ · 2020-06-28T08:03:20Z (almost 4 years ago)
I have an idea for a land based mobile organism that moves and uses photosynthesis for its primary means of energy generation. Can a motile organism conceivably get enough energy from photosynthetic processes as its primary energy source to move at a competent speed? 

Said animal doesn't have to be elephant sized, something as small as a rabbit would be fine, but said animal would have to be as fast as average animals of its mass.  For example, venus flytrap wouldn't count, it can't really move anywhere.  [Elysia Chlorotica](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysia_chlorotica#:~:text=Some%20members%20of%20this%20group,marine%20heterokont%20alga%20Vaucheria%20litorea.) doesn't count because of its speed, its heterotrophic tendencies,  size, and ocean dwelling habitat. 

According to this [answer](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/questions/206856#answer-206857) plants have low energy production rates.  However it seems due to the [square cube law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square%E2%80%93cube_law), it would seem that for smaller animals even current efficiencies of photo synthesis should be more effective, especially for a cold blooded animal. 

Additionally lots of plants are known to be primarily CO2 limited^[Ecology of the Planted Aquarium, Walstad], not limited by light, and [indeed too much light can harm plants](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2005/01/too-much-good-thing#:~:text=Plants%20are%20supposed%20to%20crave,create%20potentially%20deadly%20free%20radicals.&text=But%20if%20the%20plants%20are,that%20can%20destroy%20the%20plant.), causing plants to change in response, such as [turning red](https://buceplant.com/blogs/news/four-tips-for-achieving-red-aquarium-plants).  This leads me to believe that if an organism could make use of that extra energy, the efficiency of photosynthesis may be able to be increased to compensate beyond the levels seen by modern plants.