Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

80%
+6 −0
Meta Do we want to keep the [science-based] and [reality-check] tags?

When we did the initial import from Worldbuilding SE, the [hard-science] tag was handled specially and routed to the Researched Q&A category while removing that tag, but its siblings [science-b...

2 answers  ·  posted 4y ago by Canina‭  ·  last activity 4y ago by Monica Cellio‭

Question tags
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Canina‭ · 2020-06-02T15:45:21Z (over 4 years ago)
When we did the initial import from Worldbuilding SE, the \[hard-science\] tag was handled specially and routed to the *Researched Q&A* category while removing that tag, but its siblings \[science-based\] and \[reality-check\] were left as-is and routed to the main *Q&A* category.

My personal experience from Worldbuilding SE is that those tags have been problematic in practice.

**Should we keep them?**