Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Rigorous Science

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Rigorous Science What would a hard boundary mean in physics on the quantum-mechanical level?

In this question I asked about the possibilities of what a boundary might be like, with emphasis on the storytelling. Now I'd like to investigate what a hard boundary would mean in quantum mechani...

1 answer  ·  posted 9y ago by JDługosz‭  ·  edited 4y ago by HDE 226868‭

#2: Post edited by user avatar HDE 226868‭ · 2020-06-03T01:28:28Z (over 4 years ago)
#1: Post edited by user avatar HDE 226868‭ · 2020-06-02T18:59:19Z (over 4 years ago)
Edited formatting.
  • <p>In <a href="https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/30957/what-if-we-lived-near-a-boundary-of-the-universe">this question</a> I asked about the possibilities of what a boundary might be like, with emphasis on the storytelling.</p>
  • <p>Now I'd like to investigate what a hard boundary would mean in quantum mechanics, in a more "œhard SF" manner.</p>
  • <p>Imagine a bubble of walled-off spacetime that occurred in the lab so it could be examined up close an personal. Whether the inside is in stasis, destroyed, censored, or whatever is not important here. The interesting thing is that a boundary exists and quantum-mechanical wave functions are prohibited from entering the region contained by the boundary.</p>
  • <p>Imagine, perhaps, that it's an energy well of arbitrary height. Or, I'm intrigued by @Beta's remark, <em>"œThe mirror is 100% legal; all fields and space-time curvature are symmetrical at the boundary, or equivalently the boundary condition allows no normal components of anything."</em> Or, it just somehow prevents a wavefunction collapse from ever choosing that position.</p>
  • <p>The phenomena resulting from this should be benign. It needs to interact with normal matter! The bubble won't just fall through the Earth like a neutrino, or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Billiard_Ball" rel="nofollow noreferrer">fly off at the speed of light</a>.
  • Rather, it needs to be massive so it can stay put in the room, follow the standard path through spacetime like a massive object, and be held and pushed by normal matter. E.g. <strong>it could be placed in a stand and stay put in the lab, even as the Earth turns under it</strong>.</p>
  • <p>I'm thinking that something like Pauli Exclusion could be made to work: the electrons of matter would feel the excluded bubble nearby and distort the shape of the wave function, requiring higher energy. Making it a hard solid object is the main issue!</p>
  • <p>Second, what might be happening very close to the edge? If it's pushed and must move like a billiard ball, but it is not a point-mass, the force must somehow be communicated around the entire space. If it's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rigidity" rel="nofollow noreferrer">infinity rigid</a> there would be problems with motion due to relativistic effects.</p>
  • <p>Anybody up to communing with the Hamiltonian?</p>
  • <p>In <a href="https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/30957/what-if-we-lived-near-a-boundary-of-the-universe">this question</a> I asked about the possibilities of what a boundary might be like, with emphasis on the storytelling.</p>
  • <p>Now I'd like to investigate what a hard boundary would mean in quantum mechanics, in a more "hard science fiction" manner.</p>
  • <p>Imagine a bubble of walled-off spacetime that occurred in the lab so it could be examined up close an personal. Whether the inside is in stasis, destroyed, censored, or whatever is not important here. The interesting thing is that a boundary exists and quantum-mechanical wave functions are prohibited from entering the region contained by the boundary.</p>
  • <p>Imagine, perhaps, that it's an energy well of arbitrary height. Or, I'm intrigued by @Beta's remark, <em>"The mirror is 100% legal; all fields and space-time curvature are symmetrical at the boundary, or equivalently the boundary condition allows no normal components of anything."</em> Or, it just somehow prevents a wavefunction collapse from ever choosing that position.</p>
  • <p>The phenomena resulting from this should be benign. It needs to interact with normal matter! The bubble won't just fall through the Earth like a neutrino, or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Billiard_Ball" rel="nofollow noreferrer">fly off at the speed of light</a>.
  • Rather, it needs to be massive so it can stay put in the room, follow the standard path through spacetime like a massive object, and be held and pushed by normal matter. E.g. <strong>it could be placed in a stand and stay put in the lab, even as the Earth turns under it</strong>.</p>
  • <p>I'm thinking that something like Pauli Exclusion could be made to work: the electrons of matter would feel the excluded bubble nearby and distort the shape of the wave function, requiring higher energy. Making it a hard solid object is the main issue!</p>
  • <p>Second, what might be happening very close to the edge? If it's pushed and must move like a billiard ball, but it is not a point-mass, the force must somehow be communicated around the entire space. If it's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rigidity" rel="nofollow noreferrer">infinity rigid</a> there would be problems with motion due to relativistic effects.</p>
  • <p>Anybody up to communing with the Hamiltonian?</p>