Is a genetically modified human with a much higher height plausible?
I've created a genetically modified race of humans with an extreme height. I've taken into account the cube square law, and added some bones and muscles to help cope with that. I'm planning on making said humans 15-18 feet tall. The creation of this species is more or less handwavium. Is there anything I'm not accounting for, or is my logic not sound? Should I have made other adjustments to account for the cube square law? Is it purely impossible?
This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/176700. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
3 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
It's very unlikely that it's impossible, but you may want to remove "human" from the title, if you want to make it plausible.
There are many large animals that are 15-18 feet tall and they go on to live pretty long lives. However, the energy required to operate those bodies along with the human intellect will definitely take a toll on lifespan, unless you revamp the structure of the human body.
Blade Runner(1982) has a good explanation for this.
Tyrell: The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and you have burned so very very brightly Roy.
The replicants in the movie are basically powerful augmented humans that can accomplish insane feats of power and intelligence, but their lifespan is shortened to 4 years, due to the speed of aging and deterioration.
0 comment threads
If you lower the gravity, it is possible.
Otherwise the wear&tear will cause a short lifespan (ligaments, joint cartilages, heart). Aside larger height, the bipedal position comes anatomic disadvantages:
- stagnating blood in leg veins
- higher pressure on back spine and leg joints - with the whole body weight distributed on half the number of legs of a quadrupedal
- equilibrium maintenance is sensible to aging and a range of diseases (electrolyte imbalances, ear infection)
- making reproduction more dangerous for women (narrow the birth canal)
Example: in the 18' (=6m) you have the giraffe, with an average life span in wilderness of 25 years even if they can reach up to 38 years.
This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/a/176707. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
0 comment threads
Get ready to wave those hands
How active do these giants need to be? I ask because Wikipedia's list of tallest people notes a lot of health problems. The 25 tallest people who are no longer living had an average lifespan of only 39 years. Below is a photograph of John Rogan, the second tallest man in history. He's sitting because he was unable to walk after the age of 14.
Joints, bones, and muscle take a real pounding in extremely tall people, doubly so if your story involves extensive physical activity. It's possible to evolve a structure to support that kind of weight (lots of mammals do it) but it would take some re-engineering, either through many generations of evolution or an extra dose of handwavium. You'd also have to have a heart and lungs powerful enough to supply the farthest reaches of a 15-foot body with oxygenated blood. That requires more handwavium. Shorter people also have lower rates of afib (source) and, as listed by a 2013 study, other heart problems:
When shorter people are compared to taller people, a number of biological mechanisms evolve favoring shorter people, including reduced telomere shortening, lower atrial fibrillation, higher heart pumping efficiency, lower DNA damage, lower risk of blood clots, lower left ventricular hypertrophy and superior blood parameters.
The conclusion is that you could theoretically have super tall people, but they might be riddled with health problems and have trouble being very active.
This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/a/176705. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
0 comment threads