Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What, visually, would a hole bored in the moon look like?

+0
−0

If you took a giant drill (~one hundred meter circumference) and bored down two kilometers into the moon, what would it look like (assuming the lighting was good)? Is there a gradient, or is it a uniform type of rock?

Assume the viewer is inside of the hole, at some point in the middle, floating and looking around.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/171909. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

It would be uniform.

The crust of the Moon is, on average, about 50 km thick. There is indeed some stratification in its composition, with upper layers composed largely of feldspar and a lower layer composed of more mafic rock (Arai et al. 2008). The upper feldspathic layers appear to be $\sim$10 km thick, meaning that the composition at the bottom of your 2 km-deep hole will be fairly similar to that at the top. You'd have to make it about 5-10 times as deep to see significant composition changes - and even at that point, you'd still be far from the mantle!

That said, the properties of those rocks would change as you went down - though it's not clear how drastically. For example, it might also be interesting to consider the subsurface temperature gradient, although that's not well-known throughout the entire crust. To at least 20 meters below the surface, the gradient is roughly 1-2 Kelvin per meter (Krotikov & Troitski 1964), presumably slowing down considerably after that (possible as low as $\sim$1 Kelvin per kilometer at some point). You'd definitely see some sort of significant temperature differential immediately after the hole was finished, although I'm not sure what effects that would have. There would also be increases in density and pressure with depth.

(I should note, of course, that the crust on the far side of the Moon and the crust on the near side of the Moon differ slightly in thickness and depth, but not enough for this answer to be particularly location-dependent.)

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »