Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Creating a Hard and Feasible Molecular Disrupting Beam

+0
−0

A common weapon in science fiction is the Molecular Disrupting Beam, which disintegrates anything caught by the beam into basic atoms and molecules with no wound or gash, more as if a portion of the targeted material or person simply ceased to exist.

It comes with many names, WH40k calls them Gauss Flayers, Niven calls it the Wunderland Treatymaker, Ender's Game calls it Little Doctor...

Yet all seems to be abject handwavium and unobtainium, and there has been no true patent or design.

Thus, I ask, what are your ideas on making a working Disruptor, with only current science and resources?

Some minor unobtainium (please specify) can be allowed, but no utter handwavium (no fictional physics).

An extra assumption is that all the resources needed (energy, particles, etc...) is present.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/166783. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »