Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Could a binary planet system have a shared magnetic field?

+0
−0

I want to have a two-world binary planet system where both have intelligent life, orbiting a single star. The two planets are assumed to be tidally locked to each other and orbit each other every 36 hours. Science allows for this just fine, my main concern is realistic distancing between the planets.

I want them distanced enough that gravity is maximumly halved on the inner-facing sides of the planets.

Since they are tidally locked, it would be weird for each to have its own magnetic poles, I think, so would it be possible for a system like this to share a magnetosphere or would they have to be too far apart?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/159506. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

We can treat a planet as a magnetic dipole. In this case, the strength of the field scales as an inverse cube law (rather than the more familiar inverse square law), with some angular dependence. At the magnetic equator, we can write this as $$B(r)=B_S\left(\frac{r}{R_p}\right)^{-3}$$ where $R_p$ is the radius of the planet and $B_S$ is the magnetic field at the planet's surface. Therefore, if the other planet orbits, say, $10R_p$ away, the magnetic field coming from the other planet will be 0.1% of the surface field on the source planet. Even if we cut that in half, the field strength rises to only 1%, which is arguably not enough to provide the second planet with any of the benefits of the first.

For comparison, the Moon orbits Earth at 60 Earth radii, and is only about 1% the mass of Earth. Bringing the other planet close enough to experience a strong magnetic field would cause massive tidal effects, which would probably offset the benefits of a magnetic field!

The upside of a close orbit, of course, is that it reduces the time needed for the planets to become tidally locked to one another. That timescale goes as $\tau\propto r^6$, where $r$ is the distance between the centers of the planets. If $r$ is large, tidal locking may take a long time, but if $r$ is small, tidal locking can happen on reasonable timescales.

Some numbers

You seem to want the gravitational force from one planet to a person on the other planet's surface to be half the surface gravity of the other planet. That means that the distance from the center of one planet to the surface of the other is $\sqrt{2}R_p$. This means you'd have a surface magnetic field on the second planet of $B_S(\sqrt{2})^{-3}\approx0.35B_S$ - not bad.

On the other hand, you'd have some extremely strong tidal forces. The distance between the planet's cores is about $2.5R_p$. Tidal forces scale as $F_T\propto m/r^{3}$, where $m$ is the mass of the perturbing planet, and so you've got tidal forces about 1.3 million times as strong as the Earth experiences from the Moon.

This is . . . not a setup conducive to life.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »