What evidence would there be if radioactive decay changed 7,000 years ago?
I know we generally operate - or religiously operate - on the principle that fundamental things don't change over time. It's the bedrock of geology - Uniformitarianism. I also believe it is unprovable (which may be bad for my question).
However, assume 14C was a more unstable isotope 7,000 years ago and decayed with
Oh one more detail - the change was not precipitous. Over 500 years or so the
Running through a half-life calculator a 7,500 year old sample will 14C date to 38,900 years old if this change occurred. From comments it appears the overlapping rings from BC 5k~9k will look anomalous.
Other dating methods also exist as noted - DNA mutation rates, magnetic seabed ridges, other radioisotopes - if the evidence left behind by these comparisons could be included in an answers it would help greatly. For example, noncontinuous tree ring calibration curves can be assumed.
My only other thoughts are that maybe some of the
Purpose
This change is "theorized" by only one special scientist, and is a prelude to something worse approaching. The greater scientific community is skeptical because his evidence is "not compelling." I am hoping answers include what evidence such a change would leave behind in the various other disciplines, while also hoping such evidence is "sloppy enough" to discredit my character's theory even though it is true. I need to use your evidence to patch the plot holes, or at least make them sloppy enough that everyone else could realistically miss this.
This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/159258. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
0 comment threads