Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

If humans evolved on Mars instead of Earth, how quickly would we have detected life on Earth?

+0
−0

Suppose that both Earth and Mars was booming with life in a similar way. Except that, on Earth, there was no hominid family, and no humans evolved. Instead, humans evolved on Mars.

Assuming we had similar levels of technology, civilization, and science at similar times (e.g. agriculture ~10K years ago, telescopes ~400 years ago, physical turing machines ~80 years ago, etc), and that life on Earth was almost exactly the same, except without hominids, how soon would we have discovered life on Earth?

Also, more broadly, how quickly would we have figured out that something strange is going on with Earth that makes it different from the other planets? (Without necessarily knowing that it's life.)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/159092. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »