Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Can my planet have a very thin atmosphere only at the poles?

+0
−0

While thinking about Starfish Prime's answer to the question Algae using UV light from auroras for photosynthesis, I considered the possibility of an alternate Earth which has a normal, Earth-like atmosphere throughout most of the globe, but a thin atmosphere at the poles. This would allow for higher amounts of ultraviolet light to penetrate at high latitudes (say, > 60$^{\circ}$ N and 60$^{\circ}$ S). The problem is, I have absolutely no idea how this could happen.

Here are my specifications and requirements:

  • It's an Earth-like planet - that means the same mass and mean radius.
  • The atmosphere is like Earth's: roughly 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen.
  • At all latitudes of less than 60$^{\circ}$, the atmospheric structure should be identical to Earth's.
  • At all latitudes greater than 60$^{\circ}$, the atmosphere should become less and less dense until, at the geographic poles, the column density becomes approximately 10% of the normal value.
  • The terrain at the poles should be approximately the same as it is on Earth right now. No gigantic mountain ranges, for instance.
  • The atmospheric structure should be stable on timescales of a few billion years.
  • Whatever mechanism causes the underdensity should be natural (and, ideally, abiotic).
  • No magic, please. Let's stay within the confines of the laws of physics as they exist in our universe, too. Please try to minimize or avoid speculation.

Is this weird polar atmospheric structure possible, within the requirements set forth? I'm not requiring hard science answers, but answers should be hard science-y enough that they can justify that they meet the requirements - especially the column density.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »