Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What is the largest I can make my water planet, while remaining within Earth-like parameters?

+0
−0

What is the largest planet I can get, while still remaining within Earth-like parameters? My concern is with gravity, water pressure and atmospheric pressure. Escape velocity is less of a concern. Available elements in areas accessible for human resource collection should be somewhat Earth-like, but the composition of the planets inside is less important, as long as it is plausible.

I would like to create a planet that is mostly covered in oceans, with optionally some small islands sticking out above the ocean's surface. I would like to see as large a volume of the ocean being accessible to a human-like culture as possible. So, basically the question is about maximizing the accessible ocean volume, on a planet where humans can reasonably comfortable survive.

These humans have a technology level we could think plausible for the year 2,200 or so (sci-fi, not sci-fantasy). These humans live in underwater settlements, towns and cities and travel between them is submarines.

While this is not a hard-science question, I would minimize the liberties that have to be taken, to get the largest, human inhabitable, ocean planet possible.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/146240. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Models of planetary structure indicate that ocean planets should reach peak size at a few hundred to a thousand Earth masses, reaching maximum radii of perhaps 4-5 Earth radii. Add in some iron and silicates and you decrease the size slightly. Indeed, this mass range features peak radii for planets of most compositions; go further and the planets shrink.

For these parameters, you see surface gravities about 12 times that of Earth - too much. If you want to retain a surface gravity like that on Earth, your mass limit is about 6 Earth masses and about 2.5 Earth radii. If you want a more massive planet, you in turn need a larger planet, and it turns out that for constant surface gravity, the required radius grows quickly. For a planet of a few hundred Earth masses, the required radius to maintain Earth-like surface gravity would mean that the world is composed largely of hydrogen and helium.

I made a plot of some mass-radius curves for a pure ocean planet and a pure silicate planet, as well as curves for planets with surface gravities of $g$, $2g$, and $3g$. Your planet should be in between the $\text{H}_s\text{O}$ and $\text{MgSiO}_3$ curves, given that solid land requires some solid materials, and arguably continental plates of some sort.

Plot of mass-radius curves for water and silicate worlds

Earth-like mass, radius and surface gravity usually means an Earth-like atmosphere insofar as it should be composed of heavy gases like nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Small planets like water worlds typically do not hold onto hydrogen-helium envelopes for very long, losing them to thermal atmospheric escape.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »