Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Would It Be Feasible to Hollow Mount Everest Into a Palace?

+0
−0

Let's say that some Oriental emperor had decreed that he should move his palatial residence from China to Everest. Specifically, he wanted Mount Everest to be his palace, which means hollowing the entirety of the mountain, pretty much a human equivalent to Erebor.

Let me clarify on where I'm going with that question--the emperor would not hear any complaints regarding the process--how much time and manpower it'd take to hollow out a five-and-a-half-mile tall mountain, how to deal with lower temperature, thinner air and higher UV radiation.

This question would, instead, focus on one other problem, one that wouldn't be recognized until the 1960s--Everest is an active mountain, prone to earthquakes, landslides and avalanches. If you hollow out a tectonically active mountain, would that worsen the earthquakes, landslides and avalanches that we'd associate with such peaks?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/146054. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »