Can the event horizon of a black hole be distorted or destabilized by an extreme spin rate
Assuming that there is a means of increasing the spin rate of an existing black hole, what would happen to the shape of the event horizon as the spin rate was increased? In extremis what would eventually happen at very high spin rates? Could an extreme relativistic spin rate destabilise a black hole if the rotational energy imparted exceeded the energy content of the mass?
Assume that an arbitrarily large power source is available to spin up the black hole.
This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/142371. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
1 answer
The situation you're considering involves a rotating black hole characterized by the parameters $M$ and $J$, the mass and angular momentum of the black hole. The two are encapsulated in something called the Kerr parameter $a$, given by $a\equiv cJ/GM$ where $c$ and $G$ are the speed of light and the gravitational constant. If we define the parameter $a_*\equiv a/M$, it turns out that general relativity predicts the condition that $a_*\leq1$, or, equivalently, $J\leq GM^2/c$. This is known as the Kerr bound.
It turns out that the geometry of a rotating black hole is complicated. There are two event horizons, $r_+$ (the outer horizon) and $r_-$ (the inner horizon), given by $$r_{\pm}=M\pm\left(M^2-a^2\right)^{1/2}$$ Here, I'm working with geometrized units where $G=c=1$ and we can ignore the constants. The equation tells us that $r_-. Now, if we let $a_*>1$, it turns out that $r_{\pm}$ is a complex number, which is unphysical. This is interpreted as implying a naked singularity, which is widely believed to be impossible. This should give you some physical intuition for the Kerr bound.
Now, we've observed systems where $a_*$ is very close to the Kerr bound, but doesn't pass it. GRS 1915+05 is perhaps the most commonly-cited example, with one group deriving a lower limit of $a_*<0.98$ (McClintock et al. 2006). Different models by the group returned different precise values for $a_*$ (although all larger than $0.98$ and less than $1$). I don't think anyone believes that GRS 1915+05 violates the Kerr bound.
The point of this is that black holes with Kerr parameters close to $1$ do exist and are indeed stable. Their event horizons are indeed different from those of non-rotating black holes (as is the case for any rotating black hole, not just those near the limit), so there is distortion but not instability per se.
0 comment threads