Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Can the event horizon of a black hole be distorted or destabilized by an extreme spin rate

+0
−0

Assuming that there is a means of increasing the spin rate of an existing black hole, what would happen to the shape of the event horizon as the spin rate was increased? In extremis what would eventually happen at very high spin rates? Could an extreme relativistic spin rate destabilise a black hole if the rotational energy imparted exceeded the energy content of the mass?

Assume that an arbitrarily large power source is available to spin up the black hole.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/142371. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

The situation you're considering involves a rotating black hole characterized by the parameters $M$ and $J$, the mass and angular momentum of the black hole. The two are encapsulated in something called the Kerr parameter $a$, given by $a\equiv cJ/GM$ where $c$ and $G$ are the speed of light and the gravitational constant. If we define the parameter $a_*\equiv a/M$, it turns out that general relativity predicts the condition that $a_*\leq1$, or, equivalently, $J\leq GM^2/c$. This is known as the Kerr bound.

It turns out that the geometry of a rotating black hole is complicated. There are two event horizons, $r_+$ (the outer horizon) and $r_-$ (the inner horizon), given by $$r_{\pm}=M\pm\left(M^2-a^2\right)^{1/2}$$ Here, I'm working with geometrized units where $G=c=1$ and we can ignore the constants. The equation tells us that $r_-. Now, if we let $a_*>1$, it turns out that $r_{\pm}$ is a complex number, which is unphysical. This is interpreted as implying a naked singularity, which is widely believed to be impossible. This should give you some physical intuition for the Kerr bound.

Now, we've observed systems where $a_*$ is very close to the Kerr bound, but doesn't pass it. GRS 1915+05 is perhaps the most commonly-cited example, with one group deriving a lower limit of $a_*<0.98$ (McClintock et al. 2006). Different models by the group returned different precise values for $a_*$ (although all larger than $0.98$ and less than $1$). I don't think anyone believes that GRS 1915+05 violates the Kerr bound.

The point of this is that black holes with Kerr parameters close to $1$ do exist and are indeed stable. Their event horizons are indeed different from those of non-rotating black holes (as is the case for any rotating black hole, not just those near the limit), so there is distortion but not instability per se.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »