Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Life in the Northern Hemisphere if Beringia Never Drowned

+0
−0

When one hears the name "Beringia", we most often think the land bridge that formed as a result of a drop in sea levels during the Pleistocene, resulting in a connection between Alaska and Russia. But Beringia had been connecting East to West in a continuous cycle, the earliest so far being in the late Cretaceous, opening ceratopsians, troodontids and even tyrannosaurs from Asia to North America.

Nowadays, Beringia is submerged beneath sea level. As a result, North America has a different cast from Eurasia, the splits being listed as follows:

  • Telemetacarpal deer (whitetails, caribou, moose, deer that are more common in North America than in Eurasia) and plesiometacarpal deer (chitals, fallows, wapitis, reds, deer that are more common in Eurasia than in North America)

  • Peccaries and pigs

  • Hyenas and dogs

  • Old World porcupines (Hystricidae) and New World porcupines (Erethizontidae)

  • Pronghorns and antelopes (No, this is not a typo, as pronghorn aren't true antelopes)

  • Leopards and pumas/jaguars

  • American sparrows (Passerellidae) and Old World sparrows (Passeridae)

  • Condors and vultures

  • Pandas and raccoons

Now, in this speculative scenario, Beringia has been open for permanent business for at least five million years. Beringia would obviously homogenize the animals of the northern hemisphere, but from the list above, which side of each split would be more successful at colonizing both North America AND Eurasia at once?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/139133. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

The best choice isn't on your list:

Mastodons vs Woolley Mammoths. Both, unlike their Elephant cousins, do well in the cold. They represent two distinct species of the Proboscidean family.

From your list though, I'm gonna say..

Dogs.

Wolves are already native to the American side of Beringia. And there are Asian wolves as well.

The closest living relative of the dog is the gray wolf and there is no evidence of any other canine contributing to its genetic lineage. The dog and the extant gray wolf form two sister clades, with modern wolves not closely related to the wolves that were first domesticated...the earliest dogs arose in the time of human hunter-gatherers and not at the dawn of agriculture.

Where the genetic divergence of dog and wolf took place remains controversial, with the most plausible proposals spanning Western Europe, Central Asia, and East Asia. This has been made more complicated by the most recent proposal that fits the available evidence, which is that an initial wolf population split into East and West Eurasian wolves, these were then domesticated independently before going extinct into two distinct dog populations between 14,000-6,400 years ago, and then the Western Eurasian dog population was partially and gradually replaced by East Asian dogs that were brought by humans at least 6,400 years ago. (ref)

If wolves, dogs, and people were able to go back and forth between Asia and the Americas continuously for the entirety of their existence, the domestic dog would be on both sides and there would be more standardization. We know these species (and humans at least back in the last 50-100k years) can handle the cold weather of Beringia, unlike most of the animals on your list.

I am not sure where hyenas come in to this.

Although phylogenetically they are closer to felines and viverrids, and belong to the feliform category, hyenas are behaviourally and morphologically similar to canines in several elements of convergent evolution; both hyenas and canines are non-arboreal, cursorial hunters that catch prey with their teeth rather than claws. Both eat food quickly and may store it, and their calloused feet with large, blunt, nonretractable claws are adapted for running and making sharp turns. However, the hyenas' grooming, scent marking, defecating habits, mating and parental behaviour are consistent with the behaviour of other feliforms. ...

Although the dog-like hyenas thrived 15 million years ago (with one taxon having colonised North America), they became extinct after a change in climate along with the arrival of canids into Eurasia.(ref)

With Beringia continuously open, it is likely that more than one member of the Hyaenidae family would have made it to the Americas. And more of the same kinds could come over and replenish the population.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »