Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Increasing structural integrity on Phobos, is it possible?

+0
−0

In Warlords, Phobos is comparable to Ellis Island for Mars with its surface being home to many decent sized colonies and space ports (making use of the close proximity of Phobos to Mars) that facilitate migrants, travelers, and citizens, to and from Mars.

One issue though: Phobos is falling apart. From what I can tell Mars is slowly ripping it apart and Phobos itself isn't a solid rock which doesn't help.

The Hegemony has already begun to settle Phobos and would rather try and keep the Moon intact then try and relocate.

Now how would they go about this? The main issues are:

  1. Structural integrity of Phobos
  2. Martian gravity tearing it apart (I don't know if this can be solved simply by fixing number one)

Note: in my head I was thinking of somehow slowly filling in the cavities between rocks with, well something, and then on the surface having massive (probably hydraulic) pumps keeping it compressed.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/121579. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »