Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is it possible to have a Earth-like planet with a red moon, similar to the color of Mars?

+0
−0

With Mars' color coming from the iron oxide, is it possible for such a small body without an atmosphere to support that color?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/112991. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

The redness of Mars' surface comes from the large quantities of iron in its crust. Other terrestrial planets in the Solar System also contain iron, but not at their surfaces. Mars in particular has several things going for it that allowed it to keep much of that iron in the crust:

These both prevented differentiation - essentially, the vertical reshuffling of different minerals due to differences in weight - and the melting of iron. Both would have caused the iron to drop into the planet's mantle and core. However, the environment wasn't conducive to this restructuring, and so the iron was able to stay in the crust. Your moon - presumably with a low mass - would have the same optimal physical properties, although, as I'll talk about later, the lack of an atmosphere is problematic.

Chemically, Mars is red because iron is present in the dust layer coating much of the surface. A hematite (Fe2O3) is likely the main culprit for the color, with much of the rest of the iron being stored in a black magnetite (Fe3O4). Now, one way to generate this involves oxygen gas (O2). However, oxygen was never present on Mars in large quantities - and it clearly can't be on a body with no atmosphere!

It's been suggested that a reaction of iron (Fe2+ or Fe) with liquid water could indirectly form the proper minerals. Dissolved carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide (CO2 and SO2) could act to speed the reactions up. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) leads to yet another reaction pathway.

However, these two avenues both involve either an atmosphere or liquid water, which bother me for your specific setup. Now, it's been theorized that specific erosional processes could turn magnetite into the right kind of hematite. The crushing and colliding of magnetite with other materials provides a possibility, and doesn't necessarily require erosion by fluids (gases or liquids). It does, however, require a source for the magnetite in the first place.

All of that said, it's unlikely for hematite to easily form on a body with no atmosphere (and thus likely no liquid water). It's possible for it to form slowly, and on long geologic timescales, so I won't rule it out entirely. It would just be difficult, with a normal concentration of iron. It's possible that an iron-rich impactor - such as another protoplanet - could have collided with your moon early in its history, dumping iron all over the surface. The problem here is that collisions between celestial bodies tend to turn crusts molten - and as I said before, that's not good for keeping iron in the crust! It would cause extreme restructuring, and that's a problem. Could it happen? Maybe. Am I optimistic? Not terribly.


Inspiration from our Solar System

Let's look to our own planetary system for some inspiration. Mercury has a large amount of iron in its core - and in fact, Mercury's core is more than half of the planet, by volume. Its crust and mantle are comparatively thin. One common explanation for this is that an impactor stripped away most of the outer layers, leaving behind a planet that was, by mass, a greater percentage iron. Now, the iron in the planet was already in the core, and I would expect that the molten surface caused by such an impact would have allowed any additional iron to travel to the core.

Given that your moon is so small, I suspect that a similar impact, rather than a relatively grazing one, like the one Earth suffered, would have led to the same sort of process. Surface conditions would not have been good for iron to stay there, and it's certain that no iron would have been dredged up from the depths of the planet.

Now, a possible loophole is to have an event - or rather a series of events - like the Late Heavy Bombardment, which may have occurred about 4 billion years ago in the Solar System. A substantial number of asteroids and other bodies collided with the terrestrial planets (a similar event may be occurring in the exoplanetary system around Eta Corvi. A prominent theory for the cause of the LHB is the change in orbits of the giant planets in the outer section of the Solar System, as per the Nice model and variants thereof (e.g. the Nice II model). If an unusually large number of iron-rich meteorites struck your moon during an analogous event, you could have large-scale iron deposition without a single cataclysmic impact.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »