Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Would the early invention of the microscope naturally lead to better metallurgy or steel?

+0
−0

QUESTION

It's been established that one could invent microscopes early with a magnification of up to 1500x.

It occurred to me, though I really know nothing about this, that putting metals under a microscope could lead to a better understanding of their structure, and therefore better metallurgy. It might even lead to the knowledge that carbon is the key to making steel. (At 1500x you obviously couldn't even get close to the individual atoms, but maybe something in the structure would suggest the addition of a new ingredient.)


DETAILS

I haven't yet decided what level of magnification my world has been able to achieve, but for this question assume something between 275x and 1500x. Also assume some clever scholars with motivation to observe metals of different types and even at different heats. I'm most interested in iron and bronze, and the carbon question, but I'm interested in any application to metallurgy.

Finally, I should mention that while the technology of this world doesn't have a straightforward analogue to our own, most everything besides some of the chemistry is pre-Renaissance. This question represents one step in determining the world's metallurgical knowledge.


Just a quick note, despite my past questions this particular one does not involve pyromancers, and of course does, as stated, involve iron.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/105183. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »