Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Technology for a sci-fi airship

+0
−0

Sometimes old, discredited or impractical ideas come back to favor, because a new technology has evolved.

Let us imagine a future Earth-like world (not early 20th century or steampunk) that would consider airships again on large scale, but with a physical principle different than air buoyancy (so no hydrogen, helium or any gas, vacuum balloons, etc.). In the extreme, it could also work on planets with a lighter atmosphere than Earth.

Yet it would achieve a similar "buoyancy" effect (spontaneously staying at a certain equilibrium altitude, floating, bobbing, levitation...), at a low cost. That implies some stable uplifting factor that compensates gravity. It might also not need as big an external envelope as traditional airships, compared to the size of the gondola.

It would presumably be a technology that our current society does not have. What physical principle would it be based on? What kind of technology would it use? What would be the process of building it? How would it use energy for its motion?

As in hard science fiction, some level of scientific extrapolation is allowed (some suspension of disbelief), but it should remain overall credible. It should be articulate enough, that readers could solidly think with the components parts of the technology and how their interact with each other.

In which direction would you go?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/94272. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »