Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Hulls and hard suits, what actually has heavier armour in space?

+0
−0

I may not have been paying as much attention as perhaps I could but I have the impression that, in fiction and reality, most civilian space habitats, whether ships or stations use a relatively thick single hull. Meanwhile spacesuits and armour use heavy armoured shells of some kind of unobtainium, either an alloy or a complex composite formed into multiple layers designed to break up and absorb micro-meteors etc...

My question is which of these is actually more effective at stopping bullets. Actually what I'm really asking is, assuming we use modern hardsuits as a bench mark, could you build a gun that was "fine tuned" to kill a person through an armoured spacesuit without endangering a light weight civilian hull no heavier than what the ISS uses?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/90938. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »