Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Sand grains in space - a threat?

+0
−0

If tiny particles of solid material (the size of sand grains, for instance) were flung into space, would they pose a danger to anything they hit?

I'm no physicist, but my understanding is that objects in space do not reach terminal velocity, and, once in motion, continue to accelerate until acted upon by another force (e.g. a gravitational pull, or colliding with something). This leads me to speculate that such tiny particles would effectively become vicious little bullets that could threaten satellites, spaceships etc.

Can someone with space knowledge confirm/refute this?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/88966. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

You are incorrect.

There is no "terminal velocity", that is a term used with air resistance (or it can apply to fluid resistance) when the amount of acceleration (due to gravity) is matched by the resistance of the medium through which something is falling; like air. Pointed objects like arrows will have a higher terminal velocity than something flat. A skydiver in "dive" position will move faster than a skydiver in "spread-eagle" flat position; their terminal velocity depends upon the amount of surface area that must push air out of the way.

However, in space, there is no resistance medium; but there is also no automatic propulsion system. Objects can be attracted by gravity, but otherwise will just continue to move at whatever speed they were moving; or continue to just sit there if there is no gravitational gradient and no initial motion. They do not automatically accelerate at all.

Sand and dust, just sitting there, can be a problem for anything that is traveling at high speed and hits them: That is the equivalent of them traveling at high speed and hitting an object at rest. Since high speed does increase the energy of such a particle, you are correct in intuiting they could cause damage: But it is not because everything in space accelerates.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »