Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Effects of powerful superconducting rings on humans?

+0
−0

I recently came across this paper detailing a plan to use 12 superconducting rings around earth to strengthen our magnetic field. I'm planning on using this same idea for my own worldbuilding.

An advanced civilization is terraforming an Earth sized planet that has no natural magnetosphere. They use 12 superconducting rings to create an artificial one. The NIFS paper I linked to gives me a lot of good information that I need to use this idea, but one part of the paper, on page 10, in particular confused me. It says:

The finite magnetic field generated by a 6.4 MA superconducting ring would necessitate a 2.6 km safety zone adjacent to the cable to assure that the public exposure limit of 5 G is not exceeded.

I'm no physicist, but from what I've gathered G stands for gravitational constant. If I'm not interpreting that incorrectly, then my question is what is the relationship between powerful magnet fields and gravitational constant, and why is there a public exposure limit of 5 G?

Or, more concisely, what effects would a powerful superconducting ring have on a nearby human?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/82454. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

I'm reasonably sure that the $5\text{ G}$ there refers to $5$ Gauss. The Gauss is a unit of magnetic flux (named, of course, after Carl Friedrich Gauss). The $5\text{ G}$ figure makes sense, too; it lines up with the recommendations in this Cornell recommended safety guide for public areas (Section 5.3):

All public spaces are limited to less or equal to 5 G for static fields and less than or equal to 1 G for 50/60 Hz fields.

UC San Diego and the IEEE concur, coming up with similar figures for areas of regular exposure without shielding.

Also, let's do the calculations ourselves! The magnetic field outside a wire carrying a current $I$ varies with the distance from the wire, $r$:1 $$B=\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r}$$ where $\mu_0$ is the vacuum permeability. If we substitute in the author's $I=6.4\times10^6\text{ Amps}$ and set $r=2.6\times10^3\text{ m}$, we get $B\simeq0.0005\text{ Tesla}=5\text{ Gauss}$ - as the author claims.

High magnetic fields can of course wreak havoc with the heart and potentially other parts of the body, which is why we need to worry about this.


1 I should mention that the equation I used is really just an approximation in the case of a circular wire; it only fully holds in the case of an infinitely long straight wire. However, at such small values of $r$, it works well.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »