Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Would humanity survive an empty Earth suddenly populated with young children?

+0
−0

Scenario:

  • An Earth that is identical to our own (for the sake of being specific let's say the environment is the same as it was in 1 BCE)
  • The planet is uninhabited by humans (and no there aren't giant creatures like dinosaurs - basically it's exactly like our Earth was, only without humans).
  • Suddenly a group of 10,000 seven year olds are "dropped off" in the wilderness to either survive or perish.
  • Before being dropped off, the children were raised in a space ship that mimicked earth (they know all about plants, animals, food, etc.) and received advanced survival skills training since they could walk.
  • They are unaware of TV, radio, computers, and electronics in general (besides lighting). However, they listened to a variety of music (live) and had access to musical instruments if they wanted. They can read & write and could color and draw if they wanted to. (All of this is to say they were not denied human pleasures, only denied knowledge of and access to electronics).
  • They are aware that they would be dropped off in a new world and that they should try to survive.

My questions:

  1. Can they survive without adults or any sort of outside help/instruction/tools?
  2. I would like to know the likelihood that they would perish vs. survive.
  3. If their survival is preposterous, would increasing the starting population from 10,000 to say 50,000 change things?
  4. Would they have to be placed in smaller groups spread out over the globe?

Without revealing my greater story, let's just say the reason they are placed on the planet is for long-term monitoring of human evolution by an outside source. I would like to create a feasible situation where they would not just instantly die off. Maybe I should be asking... what is the minimum age wherein this situation would yield something besides immediate disaster?

I know you will ask, "why seven?!" I chose age seven because from what I've seen some kids can be pretty advanced at this age and it seemed an interesting premise to me...but is it totally ridiculous?

For the sake of discussion, feel free to compare it to a society of adult-kid mixture being dropped off in the same scenario.

Are there other things I should consider? (Also please feel free to ask anything to clarify if I missed something) Thank you so much for your time!

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/81994. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Children the age of 3 can be trained to recognize dangerous vs acceptable vegetable foods. At age 3 they can be in kindergarten and learning. They can also learn to acquire berries, honey, and to recognize and harvest edible insects like ants.

Presuming 90% of their training is survival skills and we don't mind the occasional injury or death of children in training, around age 5 they have the mental capacity to learn making fire, using knives, knapping flint into tools like spears, etc. They can already learn to throw, they could learn to make and use atlatl and slings:

A slung rock can have the impact of a 45 caliber bullet; and an experienced slinger can hit a bullseye (or a forehead) from a hundred feet: it is an under-rated hunting weapon, far easier to construct than a bow, and can use projectiles easily found. Further, it does not require the muscular strength of drawing a bow; the slung stone can be less than an ounce and the strength is just that required to swing it in a circle a half dozen times.

Note that the world's youngest sharpshooter (with a gun) is only six: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/shooting/6009319/Worlds-youngest-sharp-shooter-aged-six.html

I provide that as evidence of the skill level achievable by seven-year-olds if they are trained.

I presume the children will be able to hunt small game (birds, squirrels) or even deer; will have (in class) butchered and cleaned these, and will know how to make fires and cook both the animals, and the vegetables they find.

Also, note six-year-olds are already playing baseball, they can be taught to use basic clubs, and presumably in training have already killed and eaten animals.

Likewise, they can be taught to build shelters (IRL they are already building themselves forts), find water.

On a coastline or river or stream, they could build nets to fish, or make basic fence traps: Sticks sharpened and hammered into a stream bed in a 'comb' pattern, to divert larger fish (those that won't fit between the sticks) into a longish channel that ends near one of the banks in a pen, or net. Rocks can be used, but you want the fence tall enough that fish can't jump it. My point here is you don't need hooks or knives or anything else; if necessary a stick can be sharpened by grinding it against natural rock, and some vines are suitable for tying into knots to make a basic net that lasts long enough to catch some food.


Bigger problems:

I don't think survival would be an issue for trained 7-year-olds; other than injury from falls and some predation and illness (viruses, infections).

To me the bigger problem is political organization; how they are supposed to cooperate. You will also have the problem, in about four years, of impending puberty and gender separation: In actual grade schools in the USA, fifth grade is the year (just before actual puberty for most) that girls and boys start separating themselves by gender; that boys start "showing off" and becoming aggressive and girls start whispering cliques. By sixth grade, gender issues are so rampant they routinely disrupt both classes and learning.

So in year 5, how your (now 12-year-old) children manage to deal with puberty, sexuality, the violence of competitiveness, rape, etc will be interesting to see (and hard to keep plausible and realistic).

That is what could kill them by droves, indirectly. The solution for chimps and gorillas is a combination of fight and flight: Some young males are disabled or killed challenging an alpha male; other young males exile themselves (and sometimes get a young female to go with them), but there is a low chance of that resulting in a new tribe.

In humans, the males will fight for mates (and the resources to attract a mate and support a family) and kill each other over it; in hunter-gatherer tribes, warfare between neighbors can be frequent and lethal, in fact the chances of being killed by another human can be far greater than the chances of being killed by the jungle!

That's the big problem. For these kids, survival may depend on tribal socialism (our natural state) in which everybody contributes to the community stew pot, sharing the results of their hunt and gather, helping to build common shelters and fires, tool making, etc.

When sexuality enters the scene, without any culture (taught and enforced by adults) to put restrictions on how to transform from a child into an adult sexualized person, a mother or father: That new twist (for them) could break up successful tribes into factions. The sharing stops and the parts become less than the whole: They may all die out.

I am also not so sure any of that could be taught to seven-year-olds before dropping them off, or if they would care, five years later. That would seem like a lifetime to them without any adults, and with no punishment or admonishment of anybody.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »