Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Formation of a planet with a mercury core

+0
−0

Building on this question about the magnetosphere for a planet with a substantial mercury core, what is the proto-planetary environment required to form a planet with a mercury core? Specifically, I'm looking for initial conditions to the protoplanetary disk in terms of elemental composition, not the process by which planets form from that disk. Assume that a star does form and is stable enough to support planet formation.

Details about crust composition/formation and details of life on such a planet are out of scope. Also, if this planet ends up being made partly of gold, that would be interesting too. Speculate if you please, but it's not required.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/79788. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

You want a cold disk.

Mercury is an example of a volatile, which, for our purposes, means that it exists as a solid only at very low temperatures. One thesis (Funk (2015)) classifies it as "moderately volatile" (Table 1.1), also noting that its 50% condensation temperature, $T_{c}$1, is less than that of sulfur. It is, in fact, around 250 K. That is really, really, really low. For a graphical comparison, see Figure 2 of Albarede (2009).

Therefore, abundances of Mercury in the center of the protoplanetary disk were very low (Evolution of Earth and its Climate, page 64). The thing is, that's where terrestrial planets form - inside the frost line (though there should be regions inside the frost line where mercury can still condense). Sure, there's some mercury there - after all, we have it on Earth, and some of that likely formed with the planet - but not nearly enough to create an entire planetary core.

Therefore, you need a really cold planetary disk. HL Tauri appears to be a possibility. Carrasco-Gonzalez et al. (2016) found a temperature of $\sim70\text{-}140\text{ K}$ at 10 AU. Given that temperatures in disks roughly obey a power law2 of $$T(r)=T(r_o)\left(\frac{r}{r_o}\right)^{-q}$$ and $q=0.5\text{-}0.6$, then if we take the lower temperature bound, we find that $T(1\text{ AU})$, for instance, can be $221\text{ K}$, which would seem to work. There still might not be enough mercury for a whole core to form, but one can hope.


1 $T_c$ is the temperature at which 50% of all the mercury is condensed.
2 In general, disks around Sun-like stars follow a power law of $$T(r)\propto\left(\frac{r}{1\text{ AU}}\right)^{-q}\left(\frac{M_*}{M_{\odot}}\right)$$ where $M_*$ is the mass of the star and $q>0$. The proportionality constant is probably somewhere in the range of $200\text{-}300\text{ K}$; these slides give it as $280\text{ K}$.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »