Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How Would An Advanced Race Capable of Colonization Classify Planets

+0
−0

I've had a look around the internet and the only real classification system for planets seems to be the one from Star Trek, which I don't want to use. The real groups that planets fall under seem to be messy and unordered and I don't like it.

I'm looking for a way of categorizing planets into various groups relevant to colonization and what you'd need to colonize them. Bonus points if you can come up with a classification system with an order that's independent of the symbols used to denote each category. Like how the OBAFGKM system for stars used to be in order before we learned more.

The basic idea so far is a classification with 5 letters each of which can have subscripts. A letter for size, a letter for its average temperature, a letter for atmospheric composition, a letter for lithospheric composition and a letter for miscellaneous dangers and boons (like a particularly heavy moon meaning that you're lighter in march than in January or something else extraneous). Each letter will have subscripts denoting things like temperature fluctuation, the most abundant elements and other slightly less important info.

The civilisation in question does have FTL capability and the distance to the planet doesn't need to be taken into account. My main questions are about what type of classifications are most important and can be broken down into a couple of smaller questions.

  1. Would it be better to have a system of classification that used surface temperature (and its range of fluctuation)[Advantage: More directly useful information for colonists] or would it be better to base it on orbital characteristics (distance from star and eccentricity)[Advantage: The system of classification can be expanded to moons, asteroids, and comets.]?

  2. Would it be more important to define a planet's size in terms of its mass or its volume?

  3. What would be a good way to calculate a "Survivability Score" for the atmosphere and lithosphere based on the elements and proportions of elements? (Note: I reckon I'll be using a separate letter for lithospheric and atmospheric composition)


Rather than ask for the definition of planet types lets work on the creation of a system against which to judge and categorize planets in relation to how well they can be colonized.

  • What are the 5 physical planetary characteristics most important in relation to colonization
  • How can these factors be combined to create classes
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/72850. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »