Life on planets near quasars
To be very-very simple:
The very main setting of my world is a very special and very small galaxy, the galactic core of which is a quasar - with the "iconic" light beam in the middle, serving a special and iconic object for the cultures living within the galaxy.
According to a Redditor, these are extremely bright objects, with the possibility of providing enough brightness to eliminate night, even from tens of thousands of light years.
However, I decided to choose a very small "population": less than 1 million stars. If a quasar is so strong, then it would be an extremely sparse galaxy and I need to do something about it.
What is the estimated distance from a small quasar (if it's a thing at all) where brightness would not interfere normal day-night cycles?
This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/67119. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
AGN structure and emission
Let's talk about the structure of an active galactic nucleus like a quasar, and the types of emission we see from it. The classic unified model of an AGN consists of a supermassive black hole (of perhaps
Beyond the disk lies the broad-line region, where high-velocity gas clouds produce secondary emission. This area should have an outer radius of maybe
I think that what you've been considering is only the jets that arise from the accretion disk. Matter from the disk travels along magnetic field lines; electrons are accelerated, producing the synchotron emission observed from many AGN. This is indeed strong, but keep in mind that the jets are narrow and usually perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy, meaning that most objects in the galaxy are far away from the jet. If your planet exists in the equatorial plane of the quasar, it won't be hit by the jets, although it could experience radiation from the accretion disk.
Different radii
We could attempt to compute the flux the planet would receive from the disk via the inverse square law if the disk was a point source and emitting isotropically. This is decidedly not the case. If we want to look at the best-case scenario, where the black hole is accreting below the Eddington limit, we could attempt to model the disk as a thin disk and use the Shakura-Sunyaev model, where the flux is given by
There's another radius we may want to consider, which is
Here's a summary of the various length scales:
-
: the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole -
( ): the outermost point of UV emission -
: the outer radius of the accretion disk -
: the dust sublimation radius -
: the outer radius of the broad-line region -
: the distance at which the jet's flux becomes 10% of that from the Sun -
: the outer edge of the obscuring torus -
: the outer edge of the narrow-line region
The answer to your question, then, depends on the innermost zone you're comfortable with having your planets in, assuming you're good with the systems being in the plane. If not, you can be around 80 light-years away, for a direct hit from the jet.
0 comment threads