Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What is the most plausible ancestor for tool-using, sentient, bipedal reptilians?

+0
−0

A classical trope of fantasy is lizardfolk, or a similar species by another name (see for instance the Argonians of Elder Scrolls fame). In general, though, we're dealing with:

  • Bipedal, often plantigrade but sometimes digitigrade
  • Tool/weapon-using (albeit not particularly sophisticated), with opposable thumbs
  • Human-sized (roughly) with often somewhat crocodilian or monitor-lizard-esque features
  • Sentient, with a spoken language to their credit
  • Oviparous i.e. egg-laying (although this topic is not often addressed) reptiles.

What would be the most logical/plausible evolutionary ancestor for such a species, given the wildlife available on Earth, past and present, to choose from? What sort of evolutionary path would lead to such a species? What sorts of environs would favor such an evolutionary path?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/66313. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »