Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What are alternative particles to photons that would allow vision?

+0
−0

I swear I saw this question elsewhere. Let me know if this is a dupe.


Photons are great. They're little bundles of energy that

  • Reflect off of nearly everything, allowing us to see faraway objects that don't necessarily produce their own light
  • Are practically everywhere, allowing us to see most of our world
  • Are somewhat easy to detect
  • Don't kill us (most of the time)
  • Provide detail (in the form of colors/different wavelengths)

I'm interested in replacing them with a different particle for a fictional species - but I don't know if anything else matches the above qualities.

What particles, real or theoretical, would meet the above criteria well enough to provide adequate vision, besides photons?


My thoughts so far have been about neutrinos (although they are hard to detect), positrons (annihilate themselves) and gravitons (hard to detect).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/65893. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »