Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What would be the traits of a humanoid being who would live more comfortably in modern society?

+0
−0

Evolution is a great system for incremental refinements, but it's not very good at drastic changes, and can leave behind a lot of inconvenient vestigial elements. It's also rubbish at dealing with changes on the short scale (such as hairless apes going and building an agricultural society).

But let's say we had a wizard (or a sufficiently advanced technologist). Looking at present-day society, the wizard is pretty happy with how things are going, but wants to file off the rough edges. He has decided to go straight to the source and redo a human being from the inside in order to make a creature that can live more comfortably in the conditions of today. While the wizard can set up whatever he wants inside the body, the result must be biologically feasible - capable of living, reproducing, and so on without magic. The wizard will create a few thousand such beings.

The wizard might look at factors like:

  • Viability later in life. For obvious reasons, natural selection does not care much about what happens to an individual past breeding age, but in our society such individuals still hang around, and the physical and mental decay that occurs in old age might be somehow avoided.
  • Food consumption. Prehistorically, gorging yourself in times of plenty helped survive in times of hunger. In a society where nutrition is plentiful, the body's aggressive desire to stockpile fats and carbohydrates is detrimental to society.
  • Physical size. Being large and in charge was a very useful trait up until airlines started cutting down the size of seats. In a society where warfare is done by machines rather than muscles and lots of people are crowded together in cities, a smaller humanoid might be at an advantage.
  • Temperature control. Sweating is really not a great way of getting cool when you're trying to coexist alongside crowds of people in close proximity. Would it be preferable to become reptile-like and not feel hot or cold at all?
  • Senses. On the streets of New York, the sense of smell is more detrimental than anything, but walk through the door of a restaurant and suddenly you're glad to have it. Is there a way to take away the bad but keep the good?

The wizard could probably use his fiat powers to improve human society to better fit the human, but let's assume that Reed Richards is useless and the wizard is too much of a mad scientist to do things the boring, political way.

What does the ideal humanoid for the 21st century - or something close to it - look like?

Edited in response to answers: The wizard does not want to make society a kinder, gentler place to live. He likes society. Maybe he is an objectivist, and does not want people to like each other more, or to be less competitive. He just wants a humanoid being who is designed for the needs of a modern metropolis, not the African savannah of yore.

Nor is the wizard intending to replace the human population. Let's say he's making only one thousand of these humanoids, and seeding them all over the world to lead ordinary lives (as a test run, as spies, on a lark, etc).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/55779. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

I'd be tempted to add comments that have a differing assumption to a couple of your points.

If the scientist wants to improve humanity in general, step one might be to shorten the lifespan until humanity was in equilibrium. This would need to be in conjunction with contraception, and maybe social happiness about death...

Why not combine dumbing down the sense of smell with the whole sweating piece. You want sweating, but either reducing the smell sensitivity or making sweat a pleasant smell could really help in conurbations.

And if we're going down that route, why not work on waste products? Could metabolism be altered to dramatically reduce the amount/smell of human waste?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »