Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Nomenclature for software beings

+0
−0

I've seen the terms posthuman and transhuman used in fairly generic ways. But given a setting with several types of beings, what consistent naming convention could be used? I suppose the vulgar terms might be less neat and careful than the official and legal names. I'm interested in both.

1

Human brains that have been scanned and ported to man-made computer architecture.

They might be gradually improved and extended: return to the nimble mind of youth; increase short-term memory; perfect recall when desired; but still very much human.

2

There is a spectrum of improvements both in type and in degree. More advanced "beyond old limits" would be full meta-manipulation. Audit the neural network for inconsistencies; edit for better optimal representations; build or prune links with intent. I think the big difference is not in how much incremental general improvement has been made, but in going meta.

3

Changes are made that cause a shift away from being a human mind and make it more alien. This might not be major, but has profound effects. E.g. the "Vulcan" faction prevents all inconsistencies among the neural net, even reworking what was in the mind before.

4

General capacity and capability are upgraded beyond human levels by substantial amounts. But he's careful to remain human.

5

Forget backward compatibility with #4. Upgrade capacity and capability and eventually realize you've outgrown the human mind and transcend to a higher level of mind.


I suppose that all beings that came from human minds are of a class and might be called post-human. If the transcendent label is reserved for #5, what should we call the others?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/50841. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

The prefix extra- is generally used for things that are outside of normality - for example, extraterrestrial for being outside Earth-normal, or extracurricular for education outside of the normal curriculum.

Let's apply this to humans. If you're sort-of human, but not the original design, you could be known as extrahuman.

From here, you can take a major point from each of the levels of extrahumanity that you intend to create (5 of them, in your case), and prepend that to the general class name to come up with a specific name.

Your #1 could be digital extrahumans. Your #2 has a theme of meta-existence, so perhaps they're meta extrahuman. Your #3 doesn't have an obvious theme, but if there's something specific you're using, like a Vulcan faction - try Vulcan extrahumans on for size.

At #4 you're really moving out of the realm of humanity, so perhaps you need to change the base name entirely. What about superhumans, to take a cliché'd term literally? And #5 you've already decided on, but try adding the previous name to form transcendent superhumans.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »