Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What natural processes can cause a sidereal day to be significantly longer than a sidereal year?

+0
−0

Most of the planets that we know of have a sidereal day (rotational period) that is shorter or on the same order of magnitude as their sidereal year (orbital period), the latter being the case in tidal locked bodies.

Without invoking magic or super-advanced technology, is it possible for a planet to have a sidereal day that is significantly longer than its sidereal year?

What natural processes could explain such a situation?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

The classic example here is Venus, with a sidereal day of 245 Earth days and a sidereal year of 224.7 Earth days - clearly less than its sidereal day. I wrote an answer related to this on Astronomy Stack Exchange that explains Venus's slow rotation (and why it has retrograde rotation). The sequence of events, according to Alemi & Steveson (2006), is as follows:

  1. A large body collides with Venus in a giant impact.
  2. The resulting debris coalesces into a disk and then eventually a moon, which moves away because of tidal acceleration.
  3. Venus is hit by another large body, which reverses its rotation.
  4. The moon moves inwards and collides with Venus.

Now, this merely produced a sidereal day that is only slightly longer than a sidereal year. It seems quite possible that the second giant impact could have resulted in a different scenario. The motion of the moon falling towards the planet will accelerate the planet's rotation a bit. All the second impact has to do is change the planet's angular velocity just enough prior to the collision with the moon.

I wish I could give you more specific information about the exact necessary velocity and angle of the impacting bodies. The problem is that the proposed giant impacts on Venus haven't been studied in nearly as much depth as the collision between Earth and Theia that gave rise to the Moon, and it's a much more complicated problem to deal with. In terms of strict feasibility, however, the giant impact $\to$ moon formation $\to$ second giant impact $\to$ collision with moon scenario can almost certainly work.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »