Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

No sunlight, just high-energy radiation?

+0
−0

Is it possible for a planet to have very little visible-light energy and receive enough energy to support life from ionising radiation?
Dim light, including starlight and ionized-air glow is acceptable.

A planet in orbit around a binary star-black hole system:
Pros:

  • High x-ray radiation
  • A star system could credibly have planets.
  • The creation of the black hole probably involved a supernova which could lead to planet creation.

Cons:

  • Star will emit light.
  • The creation of the black hole probably involved a supernova which can destroy planets.

A rogue planet in a galaxy containing a Quasar
Pros:

  • Possibly high radiation.
  • Planet can be in high period stable orbit within galaxy.

Cons:

  • Quasars emit a lot of light.
  • Galaxies usually contain quasars in the early stages of their existence, when heavy elements are in short supply.

The planet could be covered in a thick atmosphere that blocks visible light but not high-energy radiation.

My question is; what scenario will maximize high-energy radiation but minimize visible light?

A related question is; what kind of life can evolve on such a planet?

EDIT: Since it seems to be impossible for the sky to be dark but flooded with radiation; what situation maximises the radiation-to-light quotient?

The situation I have in mind now is:

  • The planet was created in the aftermath of a supernova which turned one of the stars into a neutron star.
  • The neutron star has magnetic beams near (and heavily overlapping) the equatorial plane.
  • The neutron star slowly accretes matter from the other star, causing its magnetic poles to glow brightly in the x-ray and gamma-ray spectra.
  • The neutron star revolves every few seconds, sweeping the planet with regular bursts of radiation.
  • The planet revolves in an orbit aligned with the equatorial plane and relatively far from the parent stars.
  • The star looks relatively dim from that distance (to dim for photosynthesis).
  • Every few seconds, the atmosphere pulsates a blue light from air ionisation glow and the surface (including oceans) emits a bright flash of blue light from Cherenkov radiation.
  • Life first appears in the ocean, shielded by the protective layer of water.
  • Before the primordial soup runs dry, radiation resistant cells start to radiosynthesize and form thick curds on the surface.
  • Some life forms live underwater and come up to the surface in the night-time to graze on those curds, over many millions of years, they become quite complex.
  • Some radiation resistant life forms come to land to avoid overcrowding and predation.
  • Some of the more complex life forms venture onto land during the night-time and hide underwater before the next round of radiation.
  • Some of those life forms hide underground (in caves or artificial borrows) during the daytime, they are now fully terrestrial.
  • Intelligent life may or may not evolve.

How credible is this scenario?
One of the problems with my scenario is; how long will that setup last?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/36534. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »