Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is the world shift theory plausible or not?

+0
−0

This theory, what I call the world shift theory, states that the Earth's original orbit was solar stationary at one of its poles constantly facing the Sun, building, over time, the magnetic poles. Impact from our Moon and or other bodies threw this off balance, resulting in the present day wobble we now have today where the poles are no longer oriented this way and instead the magnetic build up is targeted around our equator. This magnetism is the cause for continental drift because it is pulling the Earth apart from the center out.

My question is:

If it is possible, what could be the potential results of this in the future? Could the magnetic buildup become enough to rip the world apart in a massive flipping of the land mass? Could electromagnetic paths from the equator cause a static discharge effect causing constant ground to ground lightening?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/36334. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »