Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Without having to deal with the gravity well, at what tech level could you build spaceships?

+0
−0

Let's say we have a society that for some reason (a MacGuffin, Unobtanium, Handwavium, whatever) have found a way to travel off the earth without having to fight gravity along the way. They can travel into orbit as easily as they can sail the seas or travel along a road.

What kind of technologies would they need in order to get into orbit and travel around the Earth from space? Space is still a cold, radioactive vacuum so there are still a bunch of hurdles of overcome.

But from what I know, the biggest hurdle has been (and still is) the prohibitive cost and difficulty of pushing something away from the Earth. So if we remove it...

  • Could we have medieval vessels in space? (I seriously doubt this)
  • Could (adapted) 19th century Ironclads make it?
  • Could a WWI era warship do it?
  • Or would we only shave a few years off the technology requirements?

What hurdles would still need to be overcome? When could it be done?

These vessels being able to reach any kind of stellar body isn't a requirement by the way. Chugging around in orbit is more than enough for what I had in mind.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/36276. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Space isn't exactly cold. It isn't hot either, because a vacuum can't be either.
Heat regulation is actually a big problem because of that vacuum, since heat can't be radiated off into the air. It would be like putting something into a vacuum thermos bottle. The heat on the inside stays on the inside except for a bit that radiates off as IR.

Being air tight is of course important, along with a way to filter out carbon dioxide.

I read somewhere that the theory of why air was important was around in the middle ages, though what made air good or bad was still a mystery. With antigravity allowing for flight early on, they probably would have figured it out sooner since hypoxia from traveling to high to quickly would have surfaced really early.

Radioactivity could be dealt with by sheathing the ship with lead, since weight isn't an issue. This of course mean's that they have to have a theory of radioactivity, which was discovered by Marie Curie in our timeline. Before that people would have gotten sick, and not had a clue why. This may have been harder to discover than the theory of gasses.

However, as long as they stay in low earth orbit, inside of the Van Allen Belt (1000 km), radiation will be less of an issue.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »